首页> 外文期刊>Assessment >Specificity and False Positive Rates of the Test of Memory Malingering, Rey 15-Item Test, and Rey Word Recognition Test Among Forensic Inpatients With Intellectual Disabilities
【24h】

Specificity and False Positive Rates of the Test of Memory Malingering, Rey 15-Item Test, and Rey Word Recognition Test Among Forensic Inpatients With Intellectual Disabilities

机译:智障法医住院医师的记忆障碍,Rey 15项目测试和Rey单词识别测试的特异性和假阳性率

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study evaluated the specificity and false positive (FP) rates of the Rey 15-Item Test (FIT), Word Recognition Test (WRT), and Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) in a sample of 21 forensic inpatients with mild intellectual disability (ID). The FIT demonstrated an FP rate of 23.8% with the standard quantitative cutoff score. Certain qualitative error types on the FIT showed promise and had low FP rates. The WRT obtained an FP rate of 0.0% with previously reported cutoff scores. Finally, the TOMM demonstrated low FP rates of 4.8% and 0.0% on Trial 2 and the Retention Trial, respectively, when applying the standard cutoff score. FP rates are reported for a range of cutoff scores and compared with published research on individuals diagnosed with ID. Results indicated that although the quantitative variables on the FIT had unacceptably high FP rates, the TOMM and WRT had low FP rates, increasing the confidence clinicians can place in scores reflecting poor effort on these measures during ID evaluations.
机译:这项研究评估了21位轻度智力障碍法医住院患者的样本中Rey 15项测试(FIT),单词识别测试(WRT)和记忆障碍测试(TOMM)的特异性和假阳性率(FP)( ID)。 FIT显示FP率为23.8%,具有标准的定量截止得分。 FIT上的某些定性错误类型显示出希望并且FP率低。 WRT获得了0.0%的FP率,且先前已报告了临界值。最后,当应用标准截断分数时,TOMM在试验2和保留试验中分别显示出4.8%和0.0%的低FP率。报告了一系列临界值的FP率,并将其与已发表的有关诊断为ID的个体的研究进行了比较。结果表明,尽管FIT上的定量变量的FP率高得令人无法接受,但TOMM和WRT的FP率却低,这增加了临床医生对ID评估过程中对这些措施的不力投入所产生的信心。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号