...
首页> 外文期刊>Attention, perception & psychophysics >Word skipping during sentence reading: effects of lexicality on parafoveal processing
【24h】

Word skipping during sentence reading: effects of lexicality on parafoveal processing

机译:句子阅读过程中的跳词:词性对副凹处理的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Two experiments examined how lexical status affects the targeting of saccades during reading by using the boundary technique to vary independently the content of a letter string when seen in parafoveal preview and when directly fixated. Experiment 1 measured the skipping rate for a target word embedded in a sentence under three parafoveal preview conditions: full preview (e.g., brain-brain), pseudohomophone preview (e.g., brane-brain), and orthographic nonword control preview (e.g., brant-brain); in the first condition, the preview string was always an English word, while in the second and third conditions, it was always a nonword. Experiment 2 investigated three conditions where the preview string was always a word: full preview (e.g., beach-beach), homophone preview (e.g., beech-beach), and orthographic control preview (e.g., bench-beach). None of the letter string manipulations used to create the preview conditions in the experiments disrupted sublexical orthographic or phonological patterns. In Experiment 1, higher skipping rates were observed for the full (lexical) preview condition, which consisted of a word, than for the nonword preview conditions (pseudohomophone and orthographic control). In contrast, Experiment 2 showed no difference in skipping rates across the three types of lexical preview conditions (full, homophone, and orthographic control), although preview type did influence reading times. This pattern indicates that skipping not only depends on the presence of disrupted sublexical patterns of orthography or phonology, but also is critically dependent on processes that are sensitive to the lexical status of letter strings in the parafovea.
机译:两项实验检查了词汇状态如何在阅读过程中通过使用边界技术独立改变字母的内容(在副凹旁预览中和直接固定时)如何影响阅读的目标。实验1在三种副凹前预览条件下测量了嵌入句子中的目标单词的跳过率:完全预览(例如,脑脑),伪谐音预览(例如,脑脑)和正字法非单词控制预览(例如,brant-脑);在第一个条件下,预览字符串始终是英语单词,而在第二个和第三个条件下,预览字符串始终是非单词。实验2研究了三个条件,其中预览字符串始终是一个单词:完全预览(例如,海滩),同音字预览(例如,山毛榉海滩)和正交控制预览(例如,长凳海滩)。在实验中,用于创建预览条件的所有字母操作都没有破坏亚词汇正字法或语音模式。在实验1中,对于包含单词的完整(词汇)预览条件,观察到的跳过率要比非单词预览条件(伪谐音和正交控制)更高。相反,尽管预览类型确实会影响阅读时间,但实验2在三种类型的词汇预览条件(完全,同音异义词和正字法控制)上的跳过率没有差异。这种模式表明,跳过不仅取决于拼字法或语音学的次词法模式是否中断,而且还严重取决于对副凹中字母字符串的词法状态敏感的过程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号