...
首页> 外文期刊>Annals of Internal Medicine >Continuation of low-dose aspirin therapy in peptic ulcer bleeding: a randomized trial.
【24h】

Continuation of low-dose aspirin therapy in peptic ulcer bleeding: a randomized trial.

机译:在消化性溃疡出血中继续小剂量阿司匹林治疗:一项随机试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: It is uncertain whether aspirin therapy should be continued after endoscopic hemostatic therapy in patients who develop peptic ulcer bleeding while receiving low-dose aspirin. OBJECTIVE: To test that continuing aspirin therapy with proton-pump inhibitors after endoscopic control of ulcer bleeding was not inferior to stopping aspirin therapy, in terms of recurrent ulcer bleeding in adults with cardiovascular or cerebrovascular diseases. DESIGN: A parallel randomized, placebo-controlled noninferiority trial, in which both patients and clinicians were blinded to treatment assignment, was conducted from 2003 to 2006 by using computer-generated numbers in concealed envelopes. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT00153725) SETTING: A tertiary endoscopy center. PATIENTS: Low-dose aspirin recipients with peptic ulcer bleeding. INTERVENTION: 78 patients received aspirin, 80 mg/d, and 78 received placebo for 8 weeks immediately after endoscopic therapy. All patients received a 72-hour infusion of pantoprazole followed by oral pantoprazole. All patients completed follow-up. MEASUREMENTS: The primary end point was recurrent ulcer bleeding within 30 days confirmed by endoscopy. Secondary end points were all-cause and specific-cause mortality in 8 weeks. RESULTS: 156 patients were included in an intention-to-treat analysis. Three patients withdrew from the trial before finishing follow-up. Recurrent ulcer bleeding within 30 days was 10.3% in the aspirin group and 5.4% in the placebo group (difference, 4.9 percentage points [95% CI, -3.6 to 13.4 percentage points]). Patients who received aspirin had lower all-cause mortality rates than patients who received placebo (1.3% vs. 12.9%; difference, 11.6 percentage points [CI, 3.7 to 19.5 percentage points]). Patients in the aspirin group had lower mortality rates attributable to cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, or gastrointestinal complications than patients in the placebo group (1.3% vs. 10.3%; difference, 9 percentage points [CI, 1.7 to 16.3 percentage points]). LIMITATIONS: The sample size is relatively small, and only low-dose aspirin, 80 mg, was used. Two patients with recurrent bleeding in the placebo group did not have further endoscopy. CONCLUSION: Among low-dose aspirin recipients who had peptic ulcer bleeding, continuous aspirin therapy may increase the risk for recurrent bleeding but potentially reduces mortality rates. Larger trials are needed to confirm these findings.
机译:背景:对于接受小剂量阿司匹林消化性溃疡出血的患者,内镜止血治疗后是否应继续阿司匹林治疗尚不确定。目的:就内镜控制的溃疡出血后,用质子泵抑制剂继续使用阿司匹林治疗不逊于停止阿司匹林治疗,就成年人心血管或脑血管疾病的复发性溃疡出血而言。设计:2003年至2006年,通过使用隐蔽信封中的计算机生成的数字进行了一项平行的,随机,安慰剂对照的非劣效性试验,其中患者和临床医生均不了解治疗方案。 (ClinicalTrials.gov注册号:NCT00153725)设置:第三级内窥镜检查中心。患者:小剂量阿司匹林接受者有消化性溃疡出血。干预措施:内镜治疗后78例患者接受阿司匹林80 mg / d,78例接受安慰剂治疗8周。所有患者均接受a托拉唑输注72小时,然后口服oral托拉唑。所有患者均完成随访。测量:主要终点是通过内窥镜检查证实的30天内复发性溃疡出血。次要终点是8周内的全因和特定原因死亡率。结果:156例患者被纳入意向性治疗分析。三名患者在完成随访之前退出了试验。阿司匹林组30天内复发性溃疡出血为10.3%,安慰剂组为5.4%(差异为4.9个百分点[95%CI,-3.6至13.4个百分点])。接受阿司匹林的患者的全因死亡率要低于接受安慰剂的患者(1.3%比12.9%;差异为11.6个百分点[CI,为3.7至19.5个百分点])。与安慰剂组相比,阿司匹林组的患者因心血管,脑血管或胃肠道并发症所致的死亡率较低(1.3%对10.3%;相差9个百分点[CI,1.7至16.3个百分点])。局限性:样本量相对较小,仅使用80毫克的小剂量阿司匹林。安慰剂组中有2例复发性出血患者没有进一步的内镜检查。结论:在患有消化性溃疡出血的小剂量阿司匹林接受者中,持续使用阿司匹林可能增加复发性出血的风险,但有可能降低死亡率。需要更大的试验来证实这些发现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号