...
首页> 外文期刊>Annals of Internal Medicine >Will evidence be enough to promote interactive communication for the benefit of patients?
【24h】

Will evidence be enough to promote interactive communication for the benefit of patients?

机译:证据是否足以促进互动交流,使患者受益?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

TO THE EDITOR: Foy and colleagues (1) provided evidence to support common sense, showing that patients with depression or diabetes have better outcomes when family physicians and specialists work together as a team, with different kinds of collaboration (for example, e-mail or face-to-face conversations).We recently conducted a study to improve quality of care, specifically evaluating the follow-up after discharge in a series of 176 persons aged 15 to 25 years who attempted suicide (mean age, 20 years) and were hospitalized (mean duration, 1.1 day) in the 9 main hospitals in Picardie, France. Among the 90% of persons who were referred for follow-up (2% declined, 5% did not require follow-up, and 3% were missing data), 42% had to make the appointment themselves, despite the importance of follow-up in the days after an attempt, especially for adolescents. As one would expect, significantly more patients (P < 0.001) completed follow-up when the appointments were planned during the hospitalization (60%) than when the patient had to make the appointment (40%).
机译:致编辑:Foy及其同事(1)提供了支持常识的证据,表明抑郁症或糖尿病患者在家庭医生和专家以团队形式开展工作时,通过不同类型的协作(例如,电子邮件)可以获得更好的结果。我们最近进行了一项研究以提高护理质量,特别是对一系列176名15至25岁自杀未遂(平均年龄20岁)的人进行了评估,并对他们的出院后随访进行了评估。在法国皮卡迪的9家主要医院住院(平均病程1.1天)。在接受随访的90%的患者中(2%拒绝了,5%不需要随访,3%的数据丢失了),尽管随访的重要性,但42%的患者必须亲自预约。在尝试后的几天里增加,尤其是对于青少年。正如人们所期望的那样,住院期间计划进行预约的患者(60%)比完成预约的患者(40%)的患者(P <0.001)要多得多。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号