...
首页> 外文期刊>Annals of Internal Medicine >Clinic-based treatment of opioid-dependent HIV-infected patients versus referral to an opioid treatment program: A randomized trial.
【24h】

Clinic-based treatment of opioid-dependent HIV-infected patients versus referral to an opioid treatment program: A randomized trial.

机译:基于临床的阿片类药物依赖的HIV感染患者的治疗与转诊阿片类药物治疗计划的比较:一项随机试验。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Opioid dependence is common in HIV clinics. Buprenorphine-naloxone (BUP) is an effective treatment of opioid dependence that may be used in routine medical settings. OBJECTIVE: To compare clinic-based treatment with BUP (clinic-based BUP) with case management and referral to an opioid treatment program (referred treatment). DESIGN: Single-center, 12-month randomized trial. Participants and investigators were aware of treatment assignments. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT00130819) SETTING: HIV clinic in Baltimore, Maryland. PATIENTS: 93 HIV-infected, opioid-dependent participants who were not receiving opioid agonist therapy and were not dependent on alcohol or benzodiazepines. INTERVENTION: Clinic-based BUP included BUP induction and dose titration, urine drug testing, and individual counseling. Referred treatment included case management and referral to an opioid-treatment program. MEASUREMENTS: Initiation and long-term receipt of opioid agonist therapy, urine drug test results, visit attendance with primary HIV care providers, use of antiretroviral therapy, and changes in HIV RNA levels and CD4 cell counts. RESULTS: The average estimated participation in opioid agonist therapy was 74% (95% CI, 61% to 84%) for clinic-based BUP and 41% (CI, 29% to 53%) for referred treatment (P < 0.001). Positive test results for opioids and cocaine were significantly less frequent in clinic-based BUP than in referred treatment, and study participants receiving clinic-based BUP attended significantly more HIV primary care visits than those receiving referred treatment. Use of antiretroviral therapy and changes in HIV RNA levels and CD4 cell counts did not differ between the 2 groups. LIMITATION: This was a small single-center study, follow-up was only moderate, and the study groups were unbalanced in terms of recent drug injections at baseline. CONCLUSION: Management of HIV-infected, opioid-dependent patients with a clinic-based BUP strategy facilitates access to opioid agonist therapy and improves outcomes of substance abuse treatment. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Health Resources and Services Administration Special Projects of National Significance program.
机译:背景:阿片类药物依赖在HIV诊所很常见。丁丙诺啡纳洛酮(BUP)是一种有效的治疗阿片类药物依赖性的药物,可用于常规医疗环境。目的:比较基于临床的BUP(基于临床的BUP)治疗与病例管理和转诊阿片类药物治疗计划(简称治疗)的比较。设计:单中心,12个月的随机试验。参与者和研究者都知道治疗任务。 (ClinicalTrials.gov注册号:NCT00130819)地点:马里兰州巴尔的摩的艾滋病诊所。患者:93名接受HIV感染且依赖阿片类药物的参与者,他们没有接受阿片类药物激动剂治疗,也不依赖酒精或苯二氮卓类药物。干预:基于临床的BUP包括BUP诱导和剂量滴定,尿液药物测试以及个人咨询。转诊治疗包括病例管理和转诊阿片类药物治疗计划。测量:阿片类药物激动剂治疗的开始和长期接受,尿液药物检测结果,主要HIV护理提供者的出诊,抗逆转录病毒治疗的使用以及HIV RNA水平和CD4细胞计数的变化。结果:基于临床的BUP平均估计参加阿片类激动剂治疗的比例为74%(95%CI,61%至84%),转诊治疗为41%(CI,29%至53%)(P <0.001)。基于临床的BUP的阿片类药物和可卡因阳性检测结果的频率明显低于转诊治疗,接受基于临床的BUP的研究参与者的HIV初级保健就诊次数明显多于接受转诊治疗的患者。两组之间抗逆转录病毒疗法的使用以及HIV RNA水平和CD4细胞计数的变化没有差异。局限性:这是一个小型的单中心研究,随访仅中等,研究组近期在基线时的药物注射方面不平衡。结论:采用基于临床的BUP策略管理受HIV感染的阿片类药物依赖的患者,有助于获得阿片类激动剂治疗的机会并改善药物滥用治疗的效果。主要资金来源:国家重要项目卫生资源与服务管理局特殊项目。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号