...
首页> 外文期刊>Annals of Internal Medicine >Transitional Care After Hospitalization for Acute Stroke or Myocardial Infarction A Systematic Review
【24h】

Transitional Care After Hospitalization for Acute Stroke or Myocardial Infarction A Systematic Review

机译:急性卒中或心肌梗死住院后的过渡护理系统评价

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Transitional care is a time-limited service to prevent discontinuous care and adverse outcomes, including rehospitalization.Purpose: To describe transitional care interventions and evidence of benefit or harm in patients hospitalized for acute stroke or myocardial infarction (Ml).Data Sources: Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, MEDLINE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and EMBASE, supplemented with manual searches of reference lists of relevant studies and review articles (January 2000 to March 2012).Study Selection: 6 reviewers screened 5857 citations to identify English-language reports of trials or observational studies that compared transitional care with usual care among adults hospitalized for stroke or Ml and that reported patient, caregiver, process, or systems outcomes within 1 year of hospital discharge.Data Extraction: Data on study design, quality, population, intervention characteristics, and patient- and system-level outcomes were extracted by 3 reviewers and confirmed by 1 additional reviewer.Data Synthesis: 62 articles representing 44 studies of transitional care for either acute stroke (27 studies) or Ml (17 studies). Four intervention types were studied: hospital-initiated support (n = 14), patient and family education (n = 7), community-based support (n = 20), and chronic disease management (n = 3). Most studies (68%) were of fair quality. Overall, moderate-strength evidence showed that hospital-initiated support reduced length of stay for patients who had a stroke, and low-strength evidence showed that it reduced mortality for patients who had an Mi. Evidence about benefits of other interventions and harms from transitional care services was insufficient.Limitations: Few studies had high-quality research designs. The usual care comparator was often poorly defined. Applicability to U.S. clinical practice was limited; only 6 studies were conducted in the United States.Conclusion: Available evidence shows that hospital-initiated transitional care can improve some outcomes in adults hospitalized for stroke or Ml. Finding additional transitional care interventions that improve functional outcomes and prevent rehospitalizations and adverse events is a high priority for the growing population of patients who have an Ml or a stroke.
机译:背景:过渡护理是一项限时服务,旨在防止不连续护理和不良后果(包括再次住院)目的:描述过渡护理干预措施以及急性卒中或心肌梗塞(Ml)住院患者的受益或伤害证据。护理和相关健康文献累积索引,MEDLINE,Cochrane系统评价数据库和EMBASE,并通过人工搜索相关研究参考文献列表和评论文章(2000年1月至2012年3月)进行研究选择:6名评论者筛选了5857篇对识别试验或观察性研究的英语报告,这些报告比较了因中风或M1住院的成年人中的过渡护理与常规护理之间的关系,并报告了出院后一年内的患者,照料者,过程或系统结局。数据提取:研究设计数据,质量,人群,干预特征以及患者和系统级结果e由3名审稿人提取并由1名其他审稿人确认。数据综合:62篇文章代表44项针对急性卒中(27项研究)或M1(17项研究)的过渡治疗研究。研究了四种干预类型:医院发起的支持(n = 14),患者和家庭教育(n = 7),社区支持(n = 20)和慢性病管理(n = 3)。大多数研究(68%)的质量都很高。总体而言,中等强度的证据表明医院支持可减少中风患者的住院时间,而低强度的证据表明医院支持可降低中风患者的死亡率。关于其他干预措施的好处和过渡护理服务带来的危害的证据不足。局限:很少有研究具有高质量的研究设计。通常的护理比较者通常定义不清。在美国临床实践中的适用性受到限制;在美国仅进行了6项研究。结论:现有证据表明,医院启动的过渡治疗可以改善因中风或Ml住院的成年人的某些结局。对于增加的M1或中风患者群体,寻找能够改善功能结局并防止再次住院和不良事件的其他过渡护理干预措施是当务之急。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号