...
首页> 外文期刊>Annals of Internal Medicine >Primary care physicians' links to other physicians through Medicare patients: the scope of care coordination.
【24h】

Primary care physicians' links to other physicians through Medicare patients: the scope of care coordination.

机译:初级保健医生通过Medicare患者与其他医生的链接:保健协调的范围。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND: Primary care physicians are expected to coordinate care for their patients. OBJECTIVE: To assess the number of physician peers providing care to the Medicare patients of a primary care physician. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of claims data. SETTING: Fee-for-service Medicare in 2005. PARTICIPANTS: 2284 primary care physicians who responded to the 2004 to 2005 Community Tracking Study Physician Survey. MEASUREMENTS: Primary patients for each physician were defined as beneficiaries for whom the physician billed for more evaluation and management visits than any other physician in 2005. The number of physician peers for each physician was the sum of other unique physicians that the index physician's primary patients visited plus other unique physicians who served as the primary physician for each of the index physician's nonprimary patients during 2005. RESULTS: The typical primary care physician has 229 (interquartile range, 125 to 340) other physicians working in 117 (interquartile range,66 to 175) practices with which care must be coordinated, equivalent to an additional 99 physicians and 53 practices for every 100 Medicare beneficiaries managed by the primary care physician. When only the 31% of a primary care physician's primary patients who had 4 or more chronic conditions was considered, the median number of peers involved was still substantial (86 physicians in 36 practices). The number of peers varied with geographic region, practice type, and reliance on Medicaid revenues. LIMITATIONS: Estimates are based only on fee-for-service Medicare patients and physician peers, and the number of peers is therefore probably an underestimate. The modest response rate of the Community Tracking Study Physician Survey may bias results in unpredictable directions. CONCLUSION: In caring for his or her own primary and nonprimary patients during a single year, each primary care physician potentially must coordinate with a large number of individual physician colleagues who also provide care to these patients. FUNDING: National Institute on Aging, American Medical Group Association, and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
机译:背景:初级保健医生应为患者提供协调治疗。目的:评估为初级保健医师的Medicare患者提供护理的医师同行人数。设计:索赔数据的横断面分析。地点:2005年按服务付费的医疗保险。参与者:2284位初级保健医生,他们对2004年至2005年的社区跟踪研究医师调查做出了回应。测量:将每个医师的主要患者定义为受益人,在2005年,该医师为其进行更多的评估和管理就诊的费用比其他任何医师都要多。每个医师的医师同行人数是索引医师的主要患者与其他唯一医师的总和。拜访了其他独特的医师,这些医师在2005年期间为索引医师的所有非初级患者担任主治医师。结果:典型的初级保健医师中还有229名(四分位数范围为66至65)之间的其他医师为229名(四分位数范围为125至340) 175)必须与护理协调的做法,相当于由初级保健医生管理的每100名Medicare受益人额外增加99名医生和53种做法。当仅考虑具有4个或更多慢性病的初级保健医师的主要患者中的31%时,所涉及的同伴的中位数仍然很大(36种实践中的86名医师)。同伴的数量随地理区域,业务类型以及对医疗补助收入的依赖而变化。局限性:估计数仅基于按服务付费的Medicare患者和医师同行,因此同行人数可能被低估了。社区跟踪研究医师调查的答复率不高,可能会将结果偏向不可预测的方向。结论:在一年内照顾自己的主要和非主要患者时,每个主要护理医师可能必须与也为这些患者提供护理的大量个体医师同事进行协调。资金:美国国家老龄研究所,美国医学团体协会和罗伯特·伍德·约翰逊基金会。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号