...
首页> 外文期刊>Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society >Results from an online survey of family delimitation in angiosperms and ferns: recommendations to the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group for thorny problems in plant classification
【24h】

Results from an online survey of family delimitation in angiosperms and ferns: recommendations to the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group for thorny problems in plant classification

机译:在线研究被子植物和蕨类植物的界线的结果:对被子植物种系研究小组提出的植物分类中棘手问题的建议

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (APG) started with ordinal relationships for angiosperm families and later came to concentrate more on issues surrounding family delimitation, generally taking a conservative approach (favouring lumping over splitting when choices were otherwise fairly evenly balanced). The history of the APG approach to classification is elaborated here, and long-term trends in taxon size are also discussed. Twenty-three questions relating to family delimitation of angiosperms (21) and ferns (two) were identified, and an open, web-based survey was conducted to determine which solutions were preferred by the botanical community. There were a total of 441 responses from 42 countries. The full survey results are presented and discussed. In general, among respondents, there was a good balance between lumping and splitting, although a much smaller percentage self-identified as splitters. Recommendations to APG for a set of specific family delimitation issues in angiosperms and ferns are made. We followed the majority vote in all but four cases and recommended ten splitting and 13 lumping options. We found that decisions were made by respondents on a case-by-case basis. Many respondents favoured lumping as a means of gaining stability by leaving circumscription issues at the lower taxonomic levels, which are of more concern to specialists (i.e. at subfamilial and tribal levels). We estimate that APG IV will not differ substantially from APG III.(c) 2015 The Linnean Society of London, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 2015, 178, 501-528.
机译:被子植物学系统研究组(APG)从被子植物家庭的序贯关系开始,后来开始更多地关注家庭划界问题,通常采取保守的方法(在其他选择相当均衡的情况下,倾向于集中于分裂)。这里详细介绍了APG分类方法的历史,并讨论了分类群大小的长期趋势。确定了与被子植物(21)和蕨类植物(两个)的家庭定界有关的二十三个问题,并进行了基于网络的开放式调查,以确定植物界首选的解决方案。来自42个国家的441份答复。介绍并讨论了完整的调查结果。通常,在受访者中,集总和拆分之间保持了良好的平衡,尽管自我识别为拆分者的比例要小得多。向APG提出了关于被子植物和蕨类植物中一系列特定家庭划界问题的建议。我们在除4个案例之外的所有案例中都进行了多数表决,并建议10个拆分和13个集总选项。我们发现,决策是由受访者根据具体情况做出的。许多答卷人都喜欢集总法,因为它可以通过将限制问题留在较低的分类标准上来获得稳定性,而分类问题则是专家(例如,在家庭以下和部落一级)更关注的问题。我们估计APG IV与APG III不会有很大的不同。(c)2015年伦敦林奈学会,《林奈学会植物学杂志》,2015,178,501-528。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号