首页> 外文期刊>Artificial Organs >Treatment Efficacy and Safety During Plasma Exchange With Citrate Anticoagulation: A Randomized Study of 4 Versus 15% Citrate
【24h】

Treatment Efficacy and Safety During Plasma Exchange With Citrate Anticoagulation: A Randomized Study of 4 Versus 15% Citrate

机译:枸rate酸抗凝治疗血浆置换期间的治疗效果和安全性:一项随机对照研究,其中有4篇相对于15%的枸rate酸盐

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In plasma exchange (PE), contrary to dialysis, there is no ultrafiltration, and the volume of anticoagulant contributes to volume overload of the patient and might also reduce PE efficiency through dilution. To reduce the volume of citrate, we compared 4 and 15% citrate anticoagulation protocols in PE in a randomized study, aiming to evaluate PE efficacy, anticoagulation efficiency, and overall safety. In addition to standard biochemical analyses during PE treatments, the elimination rate (ER) of immunoglobulins was calculated to evaluate PE efficacy. Anticoagulation was evaluated by postfilter ionized calcium, visual evaluation of the extracorporeal system, and change in the sieving coefficient (SC) during PE. Accumulation of citrate was determined by calculating the total-to-ionized calcium ratio and measuring the citrate concentration after PE. One hundred forty procedures (70 in each group) were performed in 37 patients. The mean citrate infusion rate was 197 +/- 10mL/h in the 4% and 59 +/- 5.5mL/h in the 15% groups, respectively; the total volume of infused citrate was 502 +/- 77mL versus 164 +/- 52mL (P<0.001). ER for immunoglobulin G (0.57 +/- 0.06 vs. 0.55 +/- 0.1, P=0.18), M, and A were comparable. Ionized calcium was stable during the procedures, and there were no significant side effects. Although postfilter ionized calcium was on the upper limit of the target range (0.41 +/- 0.16 vs. 0.37 +/- 0.14mmol/L, P=0.38), the visual assessment score was excellent, and even a rise in SC was observed during the procedures in both groups. The total-to-ionized calcium ratio was increased in 20 versus 22% of procedures, and citrate concentrations after PE were also similar (1306 +/- 441 vs. 1263 +/- 405mol/L). To conclude, we were unable to show superior PE efficacy in the 15% citrate group, but we significantly reduced the infused volume, which is important in patients with fluid overload. Both citrate protocols were found to provide excellent anticoagulation without significant metabolic disturbances or other side effects, confirming the safety of 15% citrate as anticoagulant during PE.
机译:在血浆交换(PE)中,与透析相反,没有超滤作用,抗凝剂的量会增加患者的容量,并可能通过稀释而降低PE效率。为了减少柠檬酸盐的量,我们在一项随机研究中比较了PE中4%和15%的柠檬酸盐抗凝方案,旨在评估PE的功效,抗凝效率和总体安全性。除了在PE治疗期间进行标准生化分析外,还计算了免疫球蛋白的消除率(ER)以评估PE疗效。通过后过滤器离子钙,体外系统的肉眼评估以及PE期间筛分系数(SC)的变化来评估抗凝作用。通过计算总离子化钙比并测量PE后的柠檬酸盐浓度来确定柠檬酸盐的积累。在37例患者中进行了140例手术(每组70例)。 4%的平均柠檬酸盐输注速率为197 +/- 10mL / h,15%的平均柠檬酸盐输注速率为59 +/- 5.5mL / h。注入的柠檬酸盐总体积为502 +/- 77mL,而164 +/- 52mL(P <0.001)。免疫球蛋白G的ER(0.57 +/- 0.06与0.55 +/- 0.1,P = 0.18),M和A相当。离子钙在手术过程中是稳定的,并且没有明显的副作用。尽管滤后离子钙在目标范围的上限(0.41 +/- 0.16 vs. 0.37 +/- 0.14mmol / L,P = 0.38),但视觉评估得分非常好,甚至观察到SC升高在两组中的过程中。总离子化钙比在20%的程序中增加了22%,PE后的柠檬酸盐浓度也相似(1306 +/- 441 vs. 1263 +/- 405mol / L)。总而言之,我们无法在15%柠檬酸盐组中显示出优异的PE疗效,但是我们显着减少了输注量,这对液体超负荷的患者很重要。发现两种柠檬酸盐方案均可提供出色的抗凝作用,而没有明显的代谢紊乱或其他副作用,从而证实了15%柠檬酸盐作为PE期间抗凝剂的安全性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号