首页> 外文期刊>Artificial Organs >Comparison of Twitch Responses During Current- or Voltage-Controlled Transcutaneous Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation
【24h】

Comparison of Twitch Responses During Current- or Voltage-Controlled Transcutaneous Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation

机译:电流或电压控制的经皮神经肌肉电刺激过程中抽搐反应的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) is an established method for functional restoration of muscle function, rehabilitation, and diagnostics. In this work, NMES was applied with surface electrodes placed on the anterior thigh to identify the main differences between current-controlled (CC) and voltage-controlled (VC) modes. Measurements of the evoked knee extension force and the myoelectric signal of quadriceps and hamstrings were taken during stimulation with different amplitudes, pulse widths, and stimulation techniques. The stimulation pulses were rectangular and symmetric biphasic for both stimulation modes. The electrode-tissue impedance influences the differences between CC and VC stimulation. The main difference is that for CC stimulation, variation of pulse width and amplitude influences the amount of nerve depolarization, whereas VC stimulation is only dependent on amplitude variations for pulse widths longer than 150s. An important remark is that these findings are strongly dependent on the characteristics of the electrode-skin interface. In our case, we used large stimulation electrodes placed on the anterior thigh, which cause higher capacitive effects. The controllability, voltage compliance, and charge characteristics of each stimulation technique should be considered during the stimulators design. For applications that require the activation of a large amount of nerve fibers, VC is a more suitable option. In contrast, if the application requires a high controllability, then CC should be chosen prior to VC.
机译:神经肌肉电刺激(NMES)是一种用于肌肉功能恢复,康复和诊断的既定方法。在这项工作中,将NMES施加在大腿前部的表面电极上,以识别电流控制(CC)模式和电压控制(VC)模式之间的主要差异。在不同幅度,脉冲宽度和刺激技术的刺激过程中,测量诱发的膝关节伸展力以及股四头肌和绳肌的肌电信号。对于两种刺激模式,刺激脉冲都是矩形的并且对称的双相的。电极组织阻抗会影响CC和VC刺激之间的差异。主要区别在于对于CC刺激,脉冲宽度和幅度的变化会影响神经去极化的量,而VC刺激仅取决于大于150s的脉冲宽度的幅度变化。重要的一点是,这些发现在很大程度上取决于电极-皮肤界面的特性。在我们的案例中,我们使用了放置在大腿前部的大型刺激电极,这会引起更高的电容效应。在刺激器设计期间,应考虑每种刺激技术的可控性,电压柔度和电荷特性。对于需要激活大量神经纤维的应用,VC是更合适的选择。相反,如果应用需要较高的可控制性,则应在VC之前选择CC。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号