首页> 外文期刊>Artificial Organs >Midterm Results of Sternal Band Closure in Open Heart Surgery and Risk Analysis of Sternal Band Removal
【24h】

Midterm Results of Sternal Band Closure in Open Heart Surgery and Risk Analysis of Sternal Band Removal

机译:开胸手术中胸骨带闭合的中期结果和胸骨带去除的风险分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Sternal dehiscence, which is responsible for the development of mediastinitis, is a serious complication after cardiothoracic surgery. We retrospectively compared the results of two methods for sternal closure after cardiothoracic surgery performed during January 2009 to May 2012. The methods comprised closure with sternal bands and steel wires (group A, n = 92) versus conventional closure using steel wires alone (group B, n = 442). Although not significantly different between the two groups, no patients undergoing sternal band closure experienced dehiscence or mediastinitis. The incidence of having to remove materials used for sternal closure was significantly higher in group A than in group B. In each case of removal in group A, the materials removed were sternal bands whose tips had caused direct cutaneous irritation. Thus, although sternal bands may be effective for rigid sternal closure, they must sometimes be removed because of chest discomfort caused by the tip of the band.
机译:胸骨裂开是导致纵隔炎发展的原因,是心胸外科手术后的严重并发症。我们回顾性比较了2009年1月至2012年5月进行的心胸外科手术后两种胸骨闭合方法的结果。这些方法包括使用胸骨带和钢丝闭合闭合术(A组,n = 92)与传统的仅使用钢丝闭合闭合闭合术(B组)的结果。 ,n = 442)。尽管两组之间无显着差异,但没有进行胸骨带闭合的患者出现裂开或纵隔炎。 A组中必须去除用于胸骨闭合的材料的发生率显着高于B组。在A组中的每种情况下,去除的材料都是胸骨带,其尖端直接引起了皮肤刺激。因此,尽管胸骨带对刚性胸骨闭合可能有效,但是由于胸骨带的尖端导致胸部不适,有时必须将其拆除。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号