首页> 外文期刊>Arthroscopy: the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association >Biomechanical and Computed Tomography Analysis of Adjustable Femoral Cortical Fixation Devices for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in a Cadaveric Human Knee Model
【24h】

Biomechanical and Computed Tomography Analysis of Adjustable Femoral Cortical Fixation Devices for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in a Cadaveric Human Knee Model

机译:尸体人膝模型中前交叉韧带重建的可调股骨皮质固定装置的生物力学和计算机断层扫描分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose: To evaluate and compare two adjustable femoral cortical suspensory fixation devices used for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction through a novel, direct computed tomography (CT) analysis metric and biomechanical laxity testing in a matched cadaveric human knee study. Methods: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with bovine tendon grafts were performed using two adjustable femoral cortical suspensory fixation devices (RigidLoop Adjustable [DePuy Synthes Mitek, Raynham, MA] and TightRope [Arthrex, Naples, FL]) in 12 knees (6 matched pairs). A mechanical testing series was used to determine each knee's laxity in the intact condition. After reconstruction, each specimen was again tested for laxity and also imaged with CT. The laxity testing and CT imaging were then repeated after 1,000 cycles of anteroposterior loading on each knee to compare changes in laxity for the two fixation devices and to visualize changes in button-to-graft distance migration through a three-dimensional CT imaging method. Results: No significant differences were found between the two fixation groups' laxity measures after reconstruction (all P values >= .620) or after cycling (all P values >= .211) at any flexion angle. In addition, no significant differences were found between the two groups regarding button-to-graft distance migration (P = .773; mean, 0.61 +/- 0.6 mm [95% confidence interval, -0.1 to 1.3 mm] in RigidLoop Adjustable group and 0.53 +/- 0.6 mm [95% confidence interval, -0.1 to 1.2 mm] in TightRope group). Conclusions: There were no significant differences between the two femoral cortical suspensory adjustable-loop devices regarding laxity outcomes or loop displacement as measured by button-to-graft distance migration.
机译:目的:通过在匹配的尸体人膝关节研究中通过新颖的直接计算机体层摄影(CT)分析指标和生物力学松弛测试,评估和比较用于前交叉韧带重建的两个可调式股骨皮质悬吊固定装置。方法:使用两个可调的股骨皮质悬吊固定装置(RigidLoop Adjustable [DePuy Synthes Mitek,Raynham,MA]和TightRope [Arthrex,Naples,FL])在12膝(6对匹配)中使用牛腱移植物重建前交叉韧带。 。机械测试系列用于确定完整状态下每个膝盖的松弛度。重建后,再次测试每个样本的松弛度,并用CT成像。然后,在每个膝盖上进行1,000次前后负荷后,重复进行松弛度测试和CT成像,以比较两个固定装置的松弛度变化,并通过三维CT成像方法可视化纽扣至移植物距离迁移的变化。结果:重建后(所有P值均≥0.620)或在任何屈曲角度下循环后(所有P值均≥0.211),两个固定组的松弛度之间均无显着差异。此外,两组之间在纽扣到植骨之间的距离迁移方面没有发现显着差异(P = .773; RigidLoop Adjustable可调组的平均值为0.61 +/- 0.6 mm [95%置信区间为-0.1至1.3 mm] TightRope组为0.53 +/- 0.6毫米[95%置信区间,-0.1至1.2毫米]。结论:两个股骨皮质悬吊式可调节环装置之间的松弛度或环移位(按纽扣到植骨间距离的迁移测量)没有显着差异。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号