首页> 外文期刊>Arthroscopy: the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association >Glenoid Diameter Is an Inaccurate Method for Percent Glenoid Bone Loss Quantification: Analysis and Techniques for Improved Accuracy
【24h】

Glenoid Diameter Is an Inaccurate Method for Percent Glenoid Bone Loss Quantification: Analysis and Techniques for Improved Accuracy

机译:关节盂直径对关节盂骨丢失百分比量化而言是不准确的方法:提高准确性的分析方法和技术

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose: To compare diameter-based glenoid bone loss quantification with a true geometric calculation for the area of a circular segment. Methods: By use of Maxima 12.01.0 mathematics modeling software (Macysma, Boston, MA), the diameter-based glenoid bone loss equation (% Bone loss = [Defect width (w)/Inferior glenoid circle diameter (D)] x 100%) was compared with a true geometric calculation for the area of a circular segment of the glenoid (Wolfram Research, Champaign, IL) rearranged in terms of w and D: Percent bone loss = (100/2 pi) (2 x arccos [1 - 2 (w/D)] - sin {2 x arccos [1 - 2 (w/D)]}). Percent error was calculated by taking the difference between the diameter equation and the true geometric calculation at varying true glenoid defect widths (w) (0% to 50% of diameter). Results: The commonly used diameter equation overestimated true glenoid bone loss at all values of w except at 0% and 50% of the diameter. The mean overestimation error was 3.9% +/- 1.9% (range, 0.0% to 5.8%), with the maximum error occurring when w was 20% of the diameter: At this value, w/D x 100% (diameter equation) predicts 20% bone loss when true bone loss is actually 14.2%. Conclusions: Diameter-based glenoid bone loss quantification overestimates true glenoid bone loss, with the maximum error occurring when theorized bone loss is 20%. To address situations for which a diameter-based bone loss quantification method must be performed or to improve the accuracy of surface-area calculations in previous diameter-based bone loss estimations, a corrective factor can be applied. Clinicians quantifying glenoid loss to make treatment decisions should be aware of the measurement methods used in the biomechanical studies on which they are basing their surgical decisions. Clinical Relevance: Diameter-based glenoid bone loss quantification overestimates true glenoid bone loss, with the maximum error occurring when theorized bone loss is 20%, a commonly used threshold for bone grafting.
机译:目的:将基于直径的关节盂骨丢失量化与真实几何计算的圆形段面积进行比较。方法:通过使用Maxima 12.01.0数学建模软件(Macysma,波士顿,马萨诸塞州),基于直径的关节盂骨丢失方程式(%骨丢失= [缺陷宽度(w)/下关节盂圆直径(D)] x 100) %)与以w和D重新排列的关节盂(Wolfram Research,Champaign,IL)的圆形部分的面积的真实几何计算进行了比较:骨丢失百分比=(100/2 pi)(2 x arccos [ 1-2(w / D)]-sin {2 x arccos [1-2(w / D)]})。误差百分比是通过在变化的真实关节盂缺损宽度(w)(直径的0%至50%)下采用直径方程和真实几何计算之间的差来计算的。结果:常用的直径方程式在所有w值(高出0%和50%的直径)时都高估了真正的关节盂骨损失。平均高估误差为3.9%+/- 1.9%(范围为0.0%至5.8%),当w为直径的20%时会出现最大误差:在该值下,w / D x 100%(直径方程)预测当真正的骨质流失实际为14.2%时,骨质流失率为20%。结论:基于直径的关节盂骨丢失量化高估了真正的关节盂骨丢失,理论上骨丢失为20%时发生最大误差。为了解决必须执行基于直径的骨丢失量化方法的情况,或在以前的基于直径的骨丢失估计中提高表面积计算的准确性的情况,可以应用校正因子。量化关节盂丢失以做出治疗决定的临床医生应了解基于其外科手术决定的生物力学研究中使用的测量方法。临床相关性:基于直径的关节盂骨丢失量化高估了真正的关节盂骨丢失,理论上的骨丢失为20%(骨移植的常用阈值)时,最大误差发生。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号