...
首页> 外文期刊>Brain topography >Mechanisms of differences in gating effects on short-and long-latency somatosensory evoked potentials relating to movement.
【24h】

Mechanisms of differences in gating effects on short-and long-latency somatosensory evoked potentials relating to movement.

机译:门控效应对与运动有关的短时和长时延体感诱发电位的影响的机制。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

We investigated the mechanisms underlying the differences in gating effects on short- and long-latency somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) relating to movement. SEPs were recorded in normal subjects for 6 different tasks in Experiment 1: Control, Movement, Distraction, Attention, Movement during Distraction and Movement during Attention, and for 4 different tasks in Experiment 2: Control, Passive Movement, Contralateral Movement and Movement Imagery. The amplitudes of short-latency SEPs were significantly reduced by active and passive movement of the stimulated hand, but long-latency SEPs (N140-P200) were significantly enhanced by active movement of the stimulated hand. Attention, Distraction, Contralateral Movement and Movement Imagery did not affect the amplitudes of SEPs. The degree of enhancement of long-latency SEPs by active Movement was greater than that by active movement with Attention or Distraction. Gating effects on long-latency SEPs were different from those on short-latency SEPs. Sincethis effect was not related to Attention/Distraction, Passive Movement, Movement Imagery or Movement of another site, it is probably due to specific centrifugal effects, which are different from more direct gating effects on short-latency components. This study showed the difference in gating effects on somatosensory perception depending on time periods following stimulation, which may indicate an interaction between motor and somatosensory cortex.
机译:我们调查了有关与运动有关的短时和长时延体感诱发电位(SEPs)的门控效应差异的潜在机制。在实验1:控制,运动,分心,注意力,注意力分散,注意期间的运动中,正常受试者的SEP记录了6个不同的任务;在实验2:控制,被动运动,对侧运动和运动图像中,SEP记录了4个不同的任务。短时SEP的幅度通过受刺激的手的主动和被动移动而显着减小,而长时延SEP(N140-P200)通过受激的手的主动运动而显着增强。注意,分心,对侧运动和运动意象不影响SEP的幅度。主动运动对长潜伏期SEPs的增强程度大于注意力或分心对主动潜伏期SEPs的增强程度。门控对长时延SEP的影响不同于对短时延SEP的影响。由于此效应与注意力/注意力分散,被动运动,运动图像或其他部位的运动无关,因此可能是由于特定的离心效应,这与对短时延分量的更直接门控效应不同。这项研究表明,门控对体感知觉的影响取决于刺激后的时间段,这可能表明运动皮层与体感皮层之间存在相互作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号