首页> 外文期刊>Arthritis and Rheumatism >Dose escalation of certolizumab pegol from 200 mg to 400 mg every other week provides no additional efficacy in rheumatoid arthritis: an analysis of individual patient-level data.
【24h】

Dose escalation of certolizumab pegol from 200 mg to 400 mg every other week provides no additional efficacy in rheumatoid arthritis: an analysis of individual patient-level data.

机译:塞妥珠单抗聚乙二醇的剂量从每两周200毫克增加到400毫克,在类风湿关节炎方面没有其他功效:对单个患者水平数据的分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether certolizumab pegol (CZP) dosage escalation from 200 mg to 400 mg every other week benefits some patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: In the extension of the Rheumatoid Arthritis Prevention of Structural Damage 1 (RAPID 1) study into an open-label study, all patients received CZP 400 mg every other week in combination with methotrexate (MTX). Before the open-label phase of the study, patients had received CZP 200 mg or 400 mg every other week, or placebo every other week, as add-on therapy to MTX. The open-label study included those who had completed the RAPID 1 study (to week 52) and also those who had been withdrawn from the study (at week 16, due to inadequate response). At 12 weeks and 48 weeks after enrollment in the open-label study, changes in the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28) were compared in dose-escalation patients (200 mg increased to 400 mg every other week) versus stable-dosage patients (400 mg every other week), using cumulative probability plots of individual patient-level data. RESULTS: In the group of patients who had completed the RAPID 1 study and had moderate or severe disease activity at entry into the open-label study, and in those who had been withdrawn early from the RAPID 1 study, the median DAS28 improvements 12 weeks after enrollment into the open-label study were similar in the dose-escalation and stable-dose groups. Individual patient-level data revealed no greater likelihood of response in the group of patients who received an increased dosage of CZP versus those in whom a stable dosage was maintained, whether they had completed the RAPID 1 study or had been withdrawn early. CONCLUSION: Although patient heterogeneity in clinical settings is acknowledged, the present results indicate that increasing the dose of CZP from 200 mg to 400 mg offers little additional benefit in RA, even for selected patients.
机译:目的:确定每两周将赛妥珠单抗(CZP)剂量从200 mg提高至400 mg是否有益于某些类风湿关节炎(RA)患者。方法:将类风湿关节炎预防结构性损伤1(RAPID 1)研究扩展为开放性研究,所有患者每隔一周接受400毫克CZP联合甲氨蝶呤(MTX)的治疗。在研究的开放标签阶段之前,患者每隔一周接受200毫克或400毫克CZP或每两周接受安慰剂,作为MTX的附加疗法。开放标签研究包括那些完成RAPID 1研究的患者(至第52周),以及那些已退出研究的患者(由于反应不足而在第16周)。纳入开放标签研究后的第12周和第48周,比较了剂量递增患者(每隔一周200 mg增加至400 mg)与稳定剂量患者的28个关节疾病活动评分(DAS28)的变化。 (每隔一周400 mg),使用各个患者水平数据的累积概率图。结果:在完成RAPID 1研究并且在进入开放标签研究时具有中度或严重疾病活动的患者组,以及在早期退出RAPID 1研究的患者中,DAS28的中位数改善了12周入组后,剂量递增组和稳定剂量组的情况相似。个别患者水平的数据显示,与接受了稳定剂量的CZP患者相比,接受CZP剂量增加的患者组中,无论完成了RAPID 1研究还是提前撤出,都没有更大的反应可能性。结论:尽管公认临床上患者的异质性,但目前的结果表明,将CZP的剂量从200 mg增加至400 mg,即使对于某些患者,RA中的附加益处也很小。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号