首页> 外文期刊>Arthritis and Rheumatism >Disease Modification and Other Trials in Systemic Sclerosis Have Come a Long Way, But Have to Go Further
【24h】

Disease Modification and Other Trials in Systemic Sclerosis Have Come a Long Way, But Have to Go Further

机译:系统性硬化症的疾病改良和其他试验已经走了很长一段路,但必须走得更远

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this issue of Arthritis Care & Research, the View article by Mendoza et al about clinical trial design in systemic sclerosis (SSc; scleroderma) suggests that there cannot be a universal design for clinical trials of disease modification in SSc because the disease has so many different presentations (1). However, it is still important in any randomized controlled trial (RCT) to use proper statistics, including sample size calculations, to be able to recruit subjects (feasible), and ideally to have subjects enrolled that are similar to SSc patients with comparable organ-based disease activity (generalizable). There will not be a single design for every trial, but basic principles must be adhered to. We have written this article as a counterview to the views by Mendoza et al (1), but most of the opinions are in agreement. The headings are ordered in a way that would mimic the process of clinical trial design and conduct (general principles, end points, and discussion of organ-specific trials in SSc skin and lung). Examples from trials of various rheumatic diseases have been provided to illustrate various aspects of trial design.
机译:在本期《关节炎护理与研究》中,Mendoza等人的View文章介绍了系统性硬化症(SSc;硬皮病)的临床试验设计,这表明SSc不能用于疾病改良的临床试验的通用设计,因为该疾病有很多不同的演示(1)。但是,在任何随机对照试验(RCT)中,使用适当的统计数据(包括样本量计算)以招募受试者(可行),并在理想情况下招募与具有相似器官功能的SSc患者相似的受试者仍然很重要。基于疾病的活动(可概括)。每个试验都不会有一个单一的设计,但是必须遵守基本原则。我们写这篇文章是为了反对Mendoza等人(1)的观点,但是大多数观点是一致的。标题的排列方式应模仿临床试验设计和进行的过程(一般原则,终点以及SSc皮肤和肺脏器官特异性试验的讨论)。提供了各种风湿性疾病试验的示例,以说明试验设计的各个方面。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号