首页> 外文期刊>Journal of engineering for gas turbines and power: Transactions of the ASME >Comparisons of Diesel PCCI Combustion Simulations Using a Representative Interactive Flamelet Model and Direct Integration of CFD With Detailed Chemistry
【24h】

Comparisons of Diesel PCCI Combustion Simulations Using a Representative Interactive Flamelet Model and Direct Integration of CFD With Detailed Chemistry

机译:使用具有代表性的交互式小火焰模型以及 CFD 与详细化学直接集成的柴油 PCCI 燃烧模拟的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Diesel engine simulation results using two different combustion models are presented in this study, namely the representative interactive flamelet (RIF) model and the direct integration of computational fluid dynamics and CHEMKIN. Both models have been implemented into an improved version of the KIVA code. The KIVA/RIF model uses a single flamelet approach and also considers the effects of vaporization on turbulence-chemistry interactions. The KIVA/CHEMKIN model uses a direct integration approach that solves for the chemical reactions in each computational cell. The above two models are applied to simulate combustion and emissions in diesel engines with comparable results. Detailed comparisons of predicted heat release data and in-cylinder flows also indicate that both models predict very similar combustion characteristics. This is likely due to the fact that after ignition, combustion rates are mixing controlled rather than chemistry controlled under the diesel conditions studied.
机译:该文给出了两种不同燃烧模型的柴油机仿真结果,即具有代表性的交互式小火焰(RIF)模型和计算流体力学与CHEMKIN的直接集成。这两个模型都已实现到 KIVA 代码的改进版本中。KIVA/RIF模型使用单一小火焰方法,还考虑了汽化对湍流-化学相互作用的影响。KIVA/CHEMKIN 模型使用直接积分方法求解每个计算单元中的化学反应。上述两个模型用于模拟柴油发动机的燃烧和排放,结果相当。预测的热释放数据和缸内流量的详细比较也表明,两个模型预测的燃烧特性非常相似。这可能是由于在点火后,燃烧速率是混合控制的,而不是在所研究的柴油条件下控制化学。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号