...
首页> 外文期刊>ASAIO journal >Relation Between Pressure and Volume Unloading During Ramp Testing in Patients Supported with a Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device
【24h】

Relation Between Pressure and Volume Unloading During Ramp Testing in Patients Supported with a Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device

机译:连续流量左心室辅助装置支持的患者在斜坡测试期间压力与容量卸载之间的关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) is the key to describing left ventricular (LV) unloading; however, the relation between pressure and the echocardiography-derived surrogate of LV volume (LV end-diastolic diameter [LVEDD]) as a function of pump speed (revolutions per minute [RPM]) in continuous-flow LV assist device (CF-LVAD) patients is unknown. In this study, the pressure-volume relation as a function of RPM during ramp testing was investigated by simultaneously measuring PCWP by Swan-Ganz catheter and LVEDD by echocardiography. The ramp protocol started at usual pump setting (ramp-base) and then went from 8,000 RPM (ramp-low) increasing by 400 RPM/5 minutes until reaching 12,000 RPM or suction/arrhythmic event (ramp-high). The study was finalized by a 25 Watt exercise test at two ramp steps. Ten patients with ramp-base of 9,300 +/- 241 RPM (at which 3 of 10 had aortic valve opening) were examined. At ramp-low, ramp-base, and ramp-high, PCWP was 20 +/- 4, 14 +/- 4, and 7 +/- 3 mm Hg (p < 0.001 for all comparisons) and LVEDD 6.6 +/- 1.0, 6.7 +/- 0.9, and 5.5 +/- 1.7 cm (p < 0.05 for all comparisons but ramp-low versus ramp-base). Correlation between PCWP and LVEDD slopes; R-2 = 0.53 (p = 0.02). In conclusion, PCWP as a function of RPM is weakly correlated with changes in LVEDD. Thus, LVEDD is not an accurate measure of unloading in CFLVAD patients.
机译:肺毛细血管楔压(PCWP)是描述左心室(LV)卸载的关键。但是,在连续流动的LV辅助装置(CF-LVAD)中,压力与超声心动图得出的LV体积替代物(LV舒张末期直径[LVEDD])之间的关系与泵速(每分钟转数[RPM])有关)患者不明。在这项研究中,通过同时测量Swan-Ganz导管的PCWP和超声心动图测量的LVEDD,研究了在斜坡测试期间压力-体积关系作为RPM的函数。斜坡协议从通常的泵设置(以斜坡为基准)开始,然后从8,000 RPM(斜坡低)开始增加400 RPM / 5分钟,直到达到12,000 RPM或吸/心律不齐事件(斜坡高)。这项研究通过在两个斜坡步骤进行的25瓦运动测试完成。检查了10例患者,其斜坡底值为9300 +/- 241 RPM(其中10人中有3人具有主动脉瓣打开)。在低坡度,高坡度基准和高坡度时,PCWP为20 +/- 4、14 +/- 4和7 +/- 3毫米汞柱(所有比较中p <0.001)和LVEDD 6.6 +/- 1.0、6.7 +/- 0.9和5.5 +/- 1.7厘米(对于所有比较而言,p <0.05,但低斜率相对于斜率基准)。 PCWP和LVEDD斜率之间的相关性; R-2 = 0.53(p = 0.02)。总之,PCWP作为RPM的函数与LVEDD的变化弱相关。因此,LVEDD并不是CFLVAD患者卸载的准确量度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号