首页> 外文期刊>Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society >Is Epipactis pseudopurpurata distinct from E. purpurata (Orchidaceae)? Evidence from morphology, anatomy, DNA and pollination biology.
【24h】

Is Epipactis pseudopurpurata distinct from E. purpurata (Orchidaceae)? Evidence from morphology, anatomy, DNA and pollination biology.

机译:Epipactis pseudopurpurata与E. purpurata(兰科)有区别吗?来自形态学,解剖学,DNA和授粉生物学的证据。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A comparative analysis of the main distinctive features of Epipactis pseudopurpurata, according to the protologue, and E. purpurata revealed that the absence or disappearance, as well as the atrophy, of a viscidium is typical and characteristic of young ramets of E. purpurata and can also result from its removal by pollinators and other insect visitors. The gynostemium morphology is similar in both species examined. The minor differences in its shape are an indication of developmental variability. The morphology of numerous ramets of E. purpurata and of their gynostemia corresponds to Mered'a's description of E. pseudopurpurata, suggesting phenotypic plasticity in the former species. Based on comparative analyses of both taxa, including molecular data, the authors propose to synonymize E. pseudopurpurata with E. purpurata in view of the low value of the taxonomic features distinguishing the two species.
机译:根据原型,对Epipactis pseudopurpurata的主要特征进行比较分析,发现E. purpurata粘液的缺乏或消失以及萎缩是E. purpurata和罐头幼株的典型特征。也是由于授粉媒介和其他昆虫来访者将其清除。雌雄蕊的形态在所检查的两个物种中都相似。其形状上的细微差异表明发育差异。紫E的许多分株及其雌雄激素血症的形态与Mered'a对假紫pur的描述相对应,表明前者具有表型可塑性。基于对两个分类单元的比较分析,包括分子数据,作者建议鉴于区分这两个物种的分类学特征的低价值,将假紫癜和紫癜同义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号