首页> 外文期刊>Arzneimittel-Forschung: =Drug Research >Evaluation of efficacy and tolerability of a fixed combination of dry extracts of thyme herb and primrose root in adults suffering from acute bronchitis with productive cough. A prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicentre clinical trial
【24h】

Evaluation of efficacy and tolerability of a fixed combination of dry extracts of thyme herb and primrose root in adults suffering from acute bronchitis with productive cough. A prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicentre clinical trial

机译:百里香香草和月见草根干提取物固定组合在患有急性支气管炎伴咳嗽的成年人中的疗效和耐受性评估。前瞻性,双盲,安慰剂对照的多中心临床试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of a fixed combination of dry extracts of thyme herb and primrose root (thyme-primrose combination) and matched placebo in patients suffering from acute bronchitis with productive cough. METHODS: In a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre Phase IV study, 361 outpatients with acute bronchitis and > or = 10 coughing fits during the day, onset of bronchial mucus production with impaired ability to cough up at a maximum of 2 days prior to recruitment, and a Bronchitis Severity Score (BSS) > or = 5 score points were randomly assigned to an 11-day treatment (1 tablet three times daily) with either thyme-primrose combination (Bronchipret TP FCT; N = 183) or placebo (N = 178). After the baseline examination (Visit 1 = Day 0), 2 control examinations were scheduled (Visit 2 = Day 4; Visit 3 = Day 10/end of treatment). The efficacy of the study treatment on acute bronchitis was evaluated by the patient's daily countingof coughing fits during the daytime (manual counter), assessment of acute bronchitis related symptoms and by the investigator's assessment of the most important symptoms of acute bronchitis using the BSS. Evaluation of tolerability was based upon adverse event (AE) monitoring, measurement of vital signs as well as the patient's and investigator's global judgement of tolerability at study end. Primary outcome was the change in frequency of coughing fits during daytime on days 7-9 according to patient's accurate daily recording with a manual counter and documentation in the diary. Treatment effects were analysed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) adjusted for centre effects. Due to significant deviation from the "preconditions" of the ANOVA, the Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon test (stratified by centre) was carried out additionally. RESULTS: The mean reduction in coughing fits on days 7 to 9 relative to baseline (primary endpoint) was 67.1% under thyme-primrose combination compared to 51.3% under placebo (p < 0.0001). In the thyme-primrose combination group, a 50% reduction in coughing fits from baseline was reached about 2 days earlier compared to the placebo group. The symptoms of acute bronchitis (BSS) improved rapidly in both groups, but regression was faster and the responder rates compared to placebo were higher at Visit 2 (77.5% vs 60.1%; p = 0.0006) and Visit 3 (92.9% vs 75.8%; p < 0.0001) under the treatment of thyme-primrose combination. Treatment was well tolerated with no difference in the frequency or severity of AE between thyme-primrose combination and placebo groups. Severe or serious AE were not reported. CONCLUSION: Oral treatment of acute bronchitis with thyme-primrose combination for about 11 days was superior to placebo in terms of efficacy. The treatment was safe and well tolerated.
机译:研究目的:本研究的目的是评估百里香药草和月见草根的干提取物固定组合(百里香-月见草组合)和匹配的安慰剂在患有急性支气管炎伴咳嗽的患者中的疗效和耐受性。方法:在一项双盲,安慰剂对照的多中心IV期研究中,有361名急性支气管炎门诊患者,且白天咳嗽≥10次,支气管粘液开始发作,最多咳嗽2天,咳嗽能力下降。在招募之前,将使用百里香-月见草组合(Bronchipret TP FCT; N = 183)的11天治疗(每天3次,每次1片)随机分配≥5分的支气管炎严重度评分(BSS)或安慰剂(N = 178)。基线检查后(访问1 =第0天),安排了2次对照检查(访问2 =第4天;访问3 =第10天/治疗结束)。通过对患者白天的咳嗽发作每日计数(手动计数器),评估急性支气管炎相关症状以及研究者使用BSS评估急性支气管炎的最重要症状来评估研究治疗急性支气管炎的疗效。耐受性的评估基于不良事件(AE)监测,生命体征的测量以及研究结束时患者和研究者对耐受性的整体判断。主要结局是根据患者在手动计数器和日记中记录的准确每日记录,在第7-9天白天咳嗽发作的频率变化。通过对中心效应进行调整的方差分析(ANOVA)分析治疗效果。由于与方差分析的“前提”有显着差异,因此另外进行了Mann-Whitney-Wilcoxon检验(以中心分层)。结果:百里香-月见草联合用药相对于基线(主要终点)在第7至9天的咳嗽发作平均减少为67.1%,而安慰剂为51.3%(p <0.0001)。与安慰剂组相比,百里香-月见草组合组的咳嗽发作比基线降低了50%。两组的急性支气管炎(BSS)症状均得到快速改善,但在访问2(77.5%vs 60.1%; p = 0.0006)和访问3(92.9%vs 75.8%)时,消退速度更快,与安慰剂相比的应答率更高。 ; p <0.0001)在百里香-报春花联合治疗下。百里香-月见草组合和安慰剂组之间的治疗耐受性良好,AE的频率或严重程度无差异。没有报道严重或严重的AE。结论:百里香-月见草联合口服治疗急性支气管炎约11天,疗效优于安慰剂。治疗是安全的,耐受性良好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号