首页> 外文期刊>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery. >Biomechanical comparison of different techniques in primary spinal surgery in osteoporotic cadaveric lumbar vertebrae: expansive pedicle screw versus polymethylmethacrylate-augmented pedicle screw.
【24h】

Biomechanical comparison of different techniques in primary spinal surgery in osteoporotic cadaveric lumbar vertebrae: expansive pedicle screw versus polymethylmethacrylate-augmented pedicle screw.

机译:骨质疏松尸体腰椎的初次脊柱手术中不同技术的生物力学比较:膨胀椎弓根螺钉与聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯增强椎弓根螺钉。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

INTRODUCTION: Transpedicular fixation can be challenging in the osteoporotic spine. Expansive pedicle screw (EPS) and polymethylmethacrylate-augmented pedicle screw (PMMA-PS) were both used to increase screw stability. However, there are a little or no biomechanical comparisons of EPS and PMMA-PS, especially in primary spinal surgery in osteoporotic vertebrae. The purpose of this study was to compare the stability of EPS and PMMA-PS in primary spinal surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen osteoporotic vertebrae were randomly divided into three groups. The conventional pedicle screw (CPS) was inserted in CPS group, the pilot hole was filled with PMMA followed by CPS insertion in PMMA-PS group, and EPS was inserted in EPS group. Twenty-four hours later, X-ray and CT examination and biomechanical tests were performed to all vertebrae. RESULTS: In PMMA-PS group, PMMA existed in bone tissue around the CPS in both vertebral body and pedicle of vertebral arch, and PMMA surrounding the screw formed a spindle-shaped structure in vertebral body. In EPS group, anterior part of EPS presented an obvious expansion in vertebral body and formed a clawlike structure. Screw stabilities in PMMA-PS and EPS groups were significantly enhanced compared with those in CPS group (P < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference between PMMA-PS and EPS groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Expansive pedicle screw can markedly enhance screw stability with a similar effect to the traditional method of screw augmentation with PMMA in primary surgery in osteoporotic vertebrae. In addition, EPS can overcome pedicle fracture, leakage and compression caused by lager screw and augmentation with PMMA. We propose that EPS is an effective, safe and easy method and has a great application potential in augmentation of screw stability in osteoporosis in clinic.
机译:简介:在骨质疏松性脊柱中,经椎弓根固定可能具有挑战性。膨胀椎弓根螺钉(EPS)和聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯增强椎弓根螺钉(PMMA-PS)均用于提高螺钉稳定性。但是,EPS和PMMA-PS的生物力学比较很少或没有,尤其是在骨质疏松椎体的初次脊柱外科手术中。这项研究的目的是比较EPS和PMMA-PS在脊柱手术中的稳定性。材料与方法:将十五个骨质疏松椎骨随机分为三组。将常规椎弓根螺钉(CPS)插入CPS组,先导孔填充PMMA,然后将CPS插入PMMA-PS组,将EPS插入EPS组。二十四小时后,对所有椎骨进行了X射线和CT检查以及生物力学测试。结果:在PMMA-PS组中,PMMA存在于椎体和椎弓根椎弓根CPS周围的骨组织中,螺钉周围的PMMA在椎体中形成纺锤形结构。在EPS组中,EPS的前部在椎体中出现明显的扩张,并形成了爪状结构。与CPS组相比,PMMA-PS和EPS组的螺钉稳定性显着增强(P <0.05)。但是,PMMA-PS组和EPS组之间没有显着差异(P> 0.05)。结论:膨胀性椎弓根螺钉可以显着增强螺钉的稳定性,其效果与骨质疏松椎骨的一次手术中传统的PMMA螺钉增强方法相似。此外,EPS可以克服由于较大的螺钉和PMMA引起的椎弓根骨折,渗漏和压迫。我们认为EPS是一种有效,安全,简便的方法,在提高骨质疏松症的螺钉稳定性方面具有很大的应用潜力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号