首页> 外文期刊>European urology >Progression-free Survival After Second Line of Therapy for Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma in Patients Treated with First-line Immunotherapy Combinations
【24h】

Progression-free Survival After Second Line of Therapy for Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma in Patients Treated with First-line Immunotherapy Combinations

机译:接受一线免疫治疗组合治疗的患者转移性透明细胞肾细胞癌二线治疗后的无进展生存期

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

? 2022 European Association of UrologyImmunotherapy (IO)-based combinations used to treat metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) include dual immune checkpoint inhibition with ipilimumab and nivolumab (IO/IO) and several combinations of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor–targeting tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) with an immune checkpoint inhibitor (TKI/IO). IO/IO and TKI/IO approaches have not been compared directly, and it is unknown whether patients who do not respond to first-line IO/IO can salvage long-term survival by receiving a second-line TKI. Progression-free survival after second-line therapy (PFS-2) evaluates the ability to be salvaged by second-line therapy. We retrospectively evaluated 173 patients treated with first-line IO/IO or TKI/IO for metastatic ccRCC at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and report PFS-2, overall survival, and response to second line of therapy (ORR2nd) for groups defined by first-line category. Although ORR2nd was significantly higher with IO/IO than with TKI/IO (47% vs 13%, p < 0.001), there was no significant difference in median PFS-2 for TKI/IO versus IO/IO (44 vs 23 mo, log-rank p = 0.1) or restricted mean survival time (RMST) for PFS-2 when adjusted for propensity score (33 vs 30 mo; difference 2.6 mo [95% confidence interval {CI}: –2.6, 7.9]; p = 0.3). There was also no significant difference in RMST for overall survival when adjusted for propensity score (38 vs 37 mo; group difference 1.0 mo [95% CI: –3.4, 5.5]; p = 0.7). These findings do not support a change in current utilization practices for IO/IO and TKI/IO treatment strategies for ccRCC. Patient summary: In cases of metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma, no significant difference was observed in progression-free survival after second line of therapy between patients receiving ipilimumab plus nivolumab and those receiving a combination of a tyrosine kinase inhibitor and an immune checkpoint inhibitor.
机译:?2022 年欧洲泌尿外科协会用于治疗转移性透明细胞肾细胞癌 (ccRCC) 的基于免疫疗法 (IO) 的组合包括 ipilimumab 和 nivolumab (IO/IO) 的双重免疫检查点抑制,以及血管内皮生长因子受体靶向酪氨酸激酶抑制剂 (TKI) 与免疫检查点抑制剂 (TKI/IO) 的几种组合。IO/IO 和 TKI/IO 方法尚未直接比较,目前尚不清楚对一线 IO/IO 无反应的患者是否可以通过接受二线 TKI 挽救长期生存。二线治疗后无进展生存期 (PFS-2) 评估二线治疗挽救的能力。我们回顾性评估了 173 例在纪念斯隆凯特琳癌症中心接受一线 IO/IO 或 TKI/IO 治疗转移性 ccRCC 的患者,并报告了按一线类别定义的组的 PFS-2、总生存期和对二线治疗的反应 (ORR2nd)。尽管IO/IO组的ORR2nd显著高于TKI/IO(47% vs 13%,p < 0.001),但当调整倾向评分时,TKI/IO组与IO/IO组的中位PFS-2(44 vs 23 mo,log-rank p = 0.1)或PFS-2的局限性平均生存时间(RMST)没有显著差异(33 vs 30 mo;差异2.6 mo [95%置信区间{CI}: –2.6, 7.9];p = 0.3)。当调整倾向评分时,RMST的总生存期也没有显著差异(38个月 vs 37个月;组别差异1。0 个月 [95% CI: –3.4, 5.5];p = 0.7)。这些发现不支持改变 ccRCC 的 IO/IO 和 TKI/IO 治疗策略的当前使用实践。患者总结:在转移性透明细胞肾细胞癌病例中,接受伊匹木单抗联合纳武利尤单抗的患者与接受酪氨酸激酶抑制剂和免疫检查点抑制剂联合治疗的患者在二线治疗后的无进展生存期没有显著差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号