首页> 外文期刊>Journal of health, organization and management >Evaluation of two longitudinal faculty leadership training programs: behavioral change and institutional impact
【24h】

Evaluation of two longitudinal faculty leadership training programs: behavioral change and institutional impact

机译:评估两个纵向教师领导力培训计划:行为改变和机构影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose - Building leadership skills among faculty in academic medicine is essential, yet professional development programs focused on leadership are not always attentive to the needs of faculty on diverse career pathways or at differing career stages-nor are they often rigorously assessed. Evaluations commonly focus on participant satisfaction and short-term learning but not behavior change and institutional impact, which are difficult to assess but arguably more meaningful. Given the substantial time and money invested in these programs, more rigorous evaluation is critical. Design/methodology/approach - The authors evaluated an intensive, shared leadership-focused training program for early-career and mid-career faculty, offered by the University of Pittsburgh's School of Medicine over the course of a year. They administered a pre/post-program assessment of confidence in key skill areas, and conducted semi-structured interviews with 21 participants between 1-4 years after program completion. Findings - Participants in both programs showed statistically significant improvement (p < 0.001) on every item measured in the pre/post-test. Analysis of the interviews revealed indications of substantial behavior change as well as institutional impact. The evaluation also suggested particular benefits for female professionals. Originality/value - The authors conducted a long-term assessment of leadership training focused on career pathway and career stage and found that it (a) prompted both positive behavioral change and institutional impact and (b) suggested benefits for female faculty in particular, which could potentially help to eliminate gender-based disparities in leadership in academic medical centers.
机译:目的 - 在学术医学教师中培养领导技能是必不可少的,但以领导力为重点的专业发展计划并不总是关注不同职业道路或不同职业阶段的教师的需求,也往往没有经过严格的评估。评估通常侧重于参与者的满意度和短期学习,而不是行为改变和机构影响,这很难评估,但可以说更有意义。鉴于在这些项目上投入了大量的时间和金钱,更严格的评估至关重要。设计/方法/途径 - 作者评估了匹兹堡大学医学院在一年的时间里为早期和中期职业教师提供的以领导力为重点的密集、共享培训计划。他们对关键技能领域的信心进行了项目前/项目后评估,并在项目完成后 1-4 年内对 21 名参与者进行了半结构化访谈。结果 - 两个项目的参与者在测试前/测试后测量的每个项目上都显示出统计学上的显着改善(p < 0.001)。对访谈的分析揭示了行为发生重大变化的迹象以及制度影响。评价还建议对女性专业人员特别有益。原创性/价值 - 作者对以职业道路和职业阶段为重点的领导力培训进行了长期评估,发现它(a)促进了积极的行为改变和机构影响,以及(b)特别建议对女性教师的好处,这可能有助于消除学术医疗中心领导力的性别差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号