...
首页> 外文期刊>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery. >Minimal invasive and computer-assisted total knee replacement compared with the minimal invasive technique: A prospective, randomized trial with short-term outcomes
【24h】

Minimal invasive and computer-assisted total knee replacement compared with the minimal invasive technique: A prospective, randomized trial with short-term outcomes

机译:与微创技术相比,微创和计算机辅助全膝关节置换术:一项前瞻性,随机试验,近期结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Introduction: Up to now, no prospective, randomized comparisons between minimal invasive and computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty (MICA-TKA), and minimal invasive technique (MI-TKA) has been documented to evaluate not only clinical, but also radiologic results of the MICA-TKA. This prospective, randomized study was performed to compare the short-term results of MICA-TKA with minimal invasive technique MI-TKA for 6-month follow-up. Patients and methods: We reported the clinical and radiological results of 80 subjects who had cruciate-substituting, TKA-implanted primary total knee arthroplasties using either minimal invasive and computer-assisted technique (40 patients Group I) or minimal invasive technique (40 patients, Group II). Tourniquet time, length of skin incision, and total blood loss were compared. Knee society scores (KSSs), knee society functional scores (KSFSs), range of motion (ROM), and radiographic results were assessed and reported preoperatively and at 6-month follow-up. Results: The accuracy of the implantations in relation to the coronal mechanical axis in Group I was superior to that of Group II (P < 0.05). The femoral rotational profile revealed the prosthesis in Group I that was implanted with significantly less internal rotation than in Group II. The average blood loss in patients of Group I was significantly reduced as compared to patients of Group II. No significant difference was detected in terms of tourniquet time or length of skin incision. Clinical results, with regard to ROMs and KSSs, as well as KSFSs were equally good in both the groups. Conclusions: Better alignment and similarity of good clinical results at short-term follow-up may provide subjects who receive MICA-TKA with long-term endurance of their implants. Further studies on longer-term outcomes and functional improvements are required to validate these possibilities.
机译:简介:迄今为止,微创和计算机辅助全膝关节置换术(MICA-TKA)与微创技术(MI-TKA)之间尚无前瞻性,随机比较的文献,以评估其临床及放射学结果云母-TKA。这项前瞻性随机研究旨在比较MICA-TKA和微创技术MI-TKA在6个月的随访中的近期结果。患者和方法:我们报道了80名使用微创和计算机辅助技术(第I组40例患者)或微创技术(40例,第二组)。比较止血带时间,皮肤切口长度和总失血量。术前和术后6个月评估并报告膝关节评分(KSSs),膝关节功能评分(KSFSs),运动范围(ROM)和射线照相结果。结果:第一组的相对于冠状机械轴的植入精度优于第二组(P <0.05)。股骨旋转轮廓显示第一组的假体植入后的内部旋转明显少于第二组。与第二组患者相比,第一组患者的平均失血量明显减少。在止血带时间或皮肤切口长度方面未检测到显着差异。两组的ROM和KSS以及KSFS的临床结果均相同。结论:短期随访中更好的对准和相似性以及良好的临床结果可为接受MICA-TKA的受试者提供长期的植入物耐力。需要对长期结果和功能改善进行进一步研究,以验证这些可能性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号