首页> 外文期刊>Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation >Can we scientifically and reliably measure the level of consciousness in vegetative and minimally conscious states? Rasch analysis of the coma recovery scale-revised
【24h】

Can we scientifically and reliably measure the level of consciousness in vegetative and minimally conscious states? Rasch analysis of the coma recovery scale-revised

机译:我们可以科学地,可靠地测量植物人和最低意识状态下的意识水平吗?修订后的昏迷恢复量表的Rasch分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives: (1) To appraise, by the means of Rasch analysis, the internal validity and reliability of the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) in a sample of patients with disorder of consciousness (DOC); and (2) to provide information about the comparability of CRS-R scores across persons with DOC across different settings and groups, including different etiologies. Design: Multicenter observational prospective study. Setting: Two rehabilitation wards, 1 intermediate care facility, and 2 nursing homes in Italy. Participants: Consecutively admitted patients (N=129) for which assessments at 2 different time points were available, giving a total sample of 258 observations. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measure: CRS-R. Results: After controlling for any possible dependency between persons' measures collected at different time points, and for uniform differential item functioning by etiology showed by the visual subscale, Rasch analysis demonstrated adequate satisfaction of all the model's requirements, including adequate ordering of scoring categories, unidimensionality, local independence, invariance (χ2 21=27.798, P=.146), and absence of differential item functioning across patients' sex, age, time, and setting. The reliability (person separation index=.896) was adequate for individual person measurement. We devised a practical raw score to measure conversion tables based on the CRS-R calibrations. Conclusions: The CRS-R is a psychometrically sound and robust measurement tool. The linear measures of ability derived from the CRS-R total scores do satisfy all the principles of scientific measurement and are sufficiently reliable for high stakes assessments, such as the diagnosis of the level of consciousness in individual patients. Future studies are needed to directly explore the capabilities of the CRS-R measures to reduce the risk of vegetative state misdiagnosis.
机译:目的:(1)通过Rasch分析,评估昏迷患者(DOC)样本中昏迷恢复量表修订版(CRS-R)的内部有效性和可靠性; (2)提供有关DOC患者在不同背景和群体(包括不同病因)下CRS-R评分可比性的信息。设计:多中心观察性前瞻性研究。地点:意大利有2个康复病房,1个中级护理设施和2个疗养院。参加者:连续入院的患者(N = 129),其在两个不同时间点的评估均可用,总共提供了258个观察值的样本。干预措施:不适用。主要指标:CRS-R。结果:在控制了在不同时间点收集的人的度量之间可能存在的依赖关系,并通过视觉子量表显示的病因对统一的差异项功能进行了分析之后,Rasch分析证明了该模型所有要求的充分满足,包括评分类别的适当排序,一维性,局部独立性,不变性(χ221 = 27.798,P = .146),并且在患者的性别,年龄,时间和环境中不存在差异项。可靠性(人员分离指数= .896)足以用于个人测量。我们设计了一个实用的原始评分,用于基于CRS-R校准来衡量转化表。结论:CRS-R是一种心理上健全且强大的测量工具。从CRS-R总分得出的能力的线性度量确实满足科学度量的所有原则,并且对于高风险评估(例如诊断单个患者的意识水平)足够可靠。需要进一步的研究来直接探索CRS-R措施降低植物人状态错误诊断风险的能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号