首页> 外文期刊>Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases: A Journal of Clinical Rheumatology and Connective Tissue Research >Construct and criterion validity of several proposed DAS28-based rheumatoid arthritis flare criteria: An OMERACT cohort validation study
【24h】

Construct and criterion validity of several proposed DAS28-based rheumatoid arthritis flare criteria: An OMERACT cohort validation study

机译:几种拟议的基于DAS28的类风湿关节炎发作标准的构造和有效性验证:一项OMERACT队列验证研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background To describe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) worsening that leads to change or re-initiation of treatment, several Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28)- based flare criteria have been described, but none validated. Methods Six previously published DAS28-based flare criteria ((1) increase in DAS28 1.2, or 0.6 if DAS28 5.1; (2) increase in DAS28 1.2, or 0.6 if DAS28 ≥3.2; (3) increase 0.6 or DAS28 3.2; (4) increase in DAS28 1.2; (5) DAS28 3.2; (6) DAS28 2.6) were tested against five hypotheses concerning criterion and construct validity: (1+2) Sensitivity and specificity 70% compared with patient's/physician's judgment; (3) difference in proportion with disease modifying antirheumatic drug/corticosteroid initiation/increase 0.2; (4) mean difference in C-reactive protein (CRP) 10 mg/l; and (5) no statistical difference in Short Form-36 Mental Health subscale change. Three different RA patient databases in which flare might occur were used. Sensitivity/specificity, χ2 and two-sample student t test analyses were done. Results The analyses included 51, 147 and 744 RA patients, from the three databases. Criterion 2 fulfilled most hypotheses: 4 out of 5. Sensitivity and specificity varied between 63%.78% and 84%.92%. Construct validity was demonstrated with 23% more treatment change, higher mean CRP (11.4 mg/l) and depression scale change of .5. Criteria 3, 5 and 6 were more sensitive, criteria 1, 2 and 4 more specific. Conclusions An increase in DAS28 1.2 or 0.6 if DAS28 ≥3.2 appears most discriminating and valid by our predefined validation criteria. Considering the other criteria, sensitivity and specificity shown here might facilitate use in different settings.
机译:背景技术为了描述类风湿性关节炎(RA)恶化导致治疗改变或重新开始的情况,已经描述了几种基于疾病活动评分28(DAS28)的耀斑标准,但尚未得到验证。方法六个先前发布的基于DAS28的耀斑标准((1)DAS28> 1.2时增加,或> 0.6,如​​果DAS28> 5.1,则> 0.6;(2)DAS28> 1.2时的增加,或DAS28≥3.2时的> 0.6;(3)> 0.6时,或DAS28> 3.2;(4)DAS28> 1.2的增加;(5)DAS28> 3.2;(6)DAS28> 2.6)针对与标准和构建体有效性有关的五个假设进行了测试:(1 + 2)敏感性和特异性> 70%与患者/医师的判断相比较; (3)改变疾病的抗风湿药/糖皮质激素启动/增加> 0.2的比例的差异; (4)C反应蛋白(CRP)的平均差异> 10 mg / l; (5)简短的36型心理健康量表变化无统计学差异。使用了三个可能发生耀斑的RA患者数据库。进行了敏感性/特异性,χ2和两样本学生t检验分析。结果分析来自三个数据库的51、147和744名RA患者。标准2满足大多数假设:5分之4。敏感性和特异性在63%.78%和84%.92%之间变化。证明了构造物的有效性,治疗改变增加了23%,平均CRP(11.4 mg / l)增加,抑郁量表改变为0.5。标准3、5和6更敏感,标准1、2和4更具体。结论如果DAS28≥3.2,根据我们预先定义的验证标准,DAS28的增加最显着且最有效,如果DAS28≥3.2,则DAS28增加> 1.2或> 0.6。考虑其他标准,此处显示的敏感性和特异性可能有助于在不同环境中使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号