首页> 外文期刊>Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation >Weight-bearing versus nonweight-bearing exercise for persons with diabetes and peripheral neuropathy: A randomized controlled trial
【24h】

Weight-bearing versus nonweight-bearing exercise for persons with diabetes and peripheral neuropathy: A randomized controlled trial

机译:糖尿病和周围神经病患者的负重锻炼与非负重锻炼:一项随机对照试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: To determine the effects of weight-bearing (WB) versus nonweight-bearing (NWB) exercise for persons with diabetes mellitus (DM) and peripheral neuropathy (PN). Design: Randomized controlled trial with evaluations at baseline and after intervention. Setting: University-based physical therapy research clinic. Participants: Participants with DM and PN (N=29) (mean age ± SD, 64.5±12.5y; mean body mass index [kg/m2] ± SD, 35.5±7.3) were randomly assigned to WB (n=15) and NWB (n=14) exercise groups. All participants (100%) completed the intervention and follow-up evaluations. Interventions: Group-specific progressive balance, flexibility, strengthening, and aerobic exercise conducted sitting or lying (NWB) or standing and walking (WB) occurred 3 times a week for 12 weeks. Main Outcome Measures: Measures included the 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) and daily step counts. Secondary outcome measures represented domains across the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Results: The WB group showed greater gains than the NWB group over time on the 6MWD and average daily step count (P.05). The mean and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) between-group difference over time was 29m (95% CI, 6-51) for the 6MWD and 1178 (95% CI, 150-2205) steps for the average daily step count. The NWB group showed greater improvements than the WB group over time in hemoglobin A1c values (P.05). Conclusions: The results of this study indicate the ability of this population with chronic disease to increase 6MWD and daily step count with a WB exercise program compared with an NWB exercise program.
机译:目的:确定负重(WB)和非负重(NWB)运动对糖尿病(DM)和周围神经病(PN)的影响。设计:随机对照试验,在基线和干预后进行评估。地点:大学物理治疗研究诊所。参与者:DM和PN(N = 29)(平均年龄±SD,64.5±12.5y;平均体重指数[kg / m2]±SD,35.5±7.3)的参与者随机分配给WB(n = 15), NWB(n = 14)运动组。所有参与者(100%)均完成了干预和随访评估。干预措施:针对特定人群的进行性平衡,灵活性,加强能力和有氧运动,包括坐或躺(NWB)或站立和行走(WB),每周进行3次,共12周。主要指标:包括6分钟步行距离(6MWD)和每日步数。次要结果指标代表国际功能,残疾和健康分类中的各个领域。结果:随着时间的推移,WB组在6MWD和平均每日步数上显示出比NWB组更大的收益(P <.05)。对于6MWD,组间随时间变化的平均置信区间(CIs)和95%置信区间(CIs)为29m(95%CI,6-51),而平均每日步数为1178(95%CI,150-2205)。随着时间的推移,NWB组显示出比WB组更大的改善,其血红蛋白A1c值(P <.05)。结论:这项研究的结果表明,与NWB运动计划相比,WB运动计划使该慢性疾病人群具有增加6MWD和每日步数的能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号