...
首页> 外文期刊>Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases: A Journal of Clinical Rheumatology and Connective Tissue Research >Insights into the efficacy of golimumab plus methotrexate in patients, with active, rheumatoid arthritis who discontinued prior anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy: post-hoc analyses from the GO-AFTER study
【24h】

Insights into the efficacy of golimumab plus methotrexate in patients, with active, rheumatoid arthritis who discontinued prior anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy: post-hoc analyses from the GO-AFTER study

机译:了解戈利木单抗联合氨甲蝶呤在活动性类风湿性关节炎患者中终止先前抗肿瘤坏死因子治疗的疗效:GO-AFTER研究的事后分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective Evaluate golimumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and previous tumour necrosis factor-a (TNF) inhibitor use.Methods Patients (n=461) previously receiving >1 TNF inhibitor were randomised to subcutaneous injections of placebo, golimumab 50 mg or golimumab 100 mg q4 weeks. Primary endpoint (>20% improvement in American College of Rheumatology (ACR20) criteria at week 14) findings have been reported for all patients in the trial. Reported herein are further assessments of efficacy/safety among patients receiving golimumab +methotrexate (MTX).Results Among efficacy-evaluable patients who received MTX at baseline, more receiving golimumab +MTX (n=201) than placebo+MTX (n=103) achieved ACR20 (40.8% vs 14.6%), ACR50 (20.9% vs 3.9%), and ACR70 (11.4% vs 2.9%) responses at week 24. Among the 137 patients who had received only one prior TNF inhibitor (adalimumab, n=33; etanercept, n=47; and infliximab, n=57), week 24 ACR20 rates were 30.3%, 46.8% and 50.9%, respectively, and thus lowest among those who previously used adalimumab. ACR20 response rates were 44.5% (61/137), 36,2% (17/47) and 23.5% (4/17) among patients who had received one, two or three TNF inhibitors, respectively. Adverse event (AE) rates were comparable across type/ number of prior anti-TNF agents, but appeared somewhat higher among patients who discontinued previous TNF inhibitor(s) due to intolerance (37/49, 75.5%) versus lack of efficacy (LOE, 113/191, 59.2%). Conclusions Patients with active RA previously treated with >1 TNF inhibitor had clinically relevant improvement with golimumab+MTX, which appeared somewhat enhanced among those who received only etanercept or infliximab as their prior TNF inhibitor. Golimumab+MTX safety appeared similar across patients, regardless of TNF inhibitor(s) previously used, with fewer AEs occurring among patients who discontinued prior therapy for LOE.
机译:目的评估戈利木单抗用于活动性类风湿关节炎(RA)和既往肿瘤坏死因子-a(TNF)抑制剂使用的患者。方法(n = 461)先前接受> 1 TNF抑制剂的患者被随机分为皮下注射安慰剂,戈利木单抗50 mg或戈利木单抗100 mg第4周。研究中报告了所有研究对象的主要终点(在美国风湿病学会(ACR20)标准在第14周时改善了20%以上)的发现。本文报道了在接受戈利木单抗+甲氨蝶呤(MTX)的患者中疗效/安全性的进一步评估。结果在基线时接受MTX的可评估疗效的患者中,接受戈利木单抗+ MTX(n = 201)的患者多于安慰剂+ MTX(n = 103)在第24周时获得了ACR20(40.8%对14.6%),ACR50(20.9%对3.9%)和ACR70(11.4%对2.9%)反应。在137例仅接受过一种TNF抑制剂治疗的患者中(阿达木单抗,n = 33;依那西普(n = 47;英夫利昔单抗,n = 57),第24周的ACR20发生率分别为30.3%,46.8%和50.9%,因此在以前使用阿达木单抗的患者中最低。在接受一种,两种或三种TNF抑制剂的患者中,ACR20应答率分别为44.5%(61/137),36.2%(17/47)和23.5%(4/17)。不良事件(AE)的发生率在以往抗TNF药物的类型/数量上是可比的,但由于不耐受(37/49,75.5%)而与缺乏疗效(LOE)的关系而终止使用先前TNF抑制剂的患者中的不良事件发生率更高,113 / 191,59.2%)。结论以前接受过> 1 TNF抑制剂治疗的活动性RA患者在临床上与golimumab + MTX有关的改善,在仅接受依那西普或英夫利昔单抗作为其既往TNF抑制剂的患者中似乎有所增强。不管以前使用哪种TNF抑制剂,戈利木单抗+ MTX的安全性在患者中似乎相似,在中断LOE先前治疗的患者中发生的AE较少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号