...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of the American Medical Directors Association >Nursing home quality: A comparative analysis using cms nursing home compare data to examine differences between rural and nonrural facilities
【24h】

Nursing home quality: A comparative analysis using cms nursing home compare data to examine differences between rural and nonrural facilities

机译:养老院质量:使用cms养老院比较数据的比较分析,以检查农村和非农村设施之间的差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Background: Advances in medicine and an aging US population suggest that there will be an increasing demand for nursing home services. Although nursing homes are highly regulated and scrutinized, their quality remains a concern and may be a greater issue to those living in rural communities. Despite this, few studies have investigated differences in the quality of nursing home care across the rural-urban continuum. The purpose of this study was to compare the quality of rural and nonrural nursing homes by using aggregated rankings on multiple quality measures calculated by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and reported on their Nursing Home Compare Web site. Methods: Independent-sample t tests were performed to compare the mean ratings on the reported quality measures of rural and nonrural nursing homes. A linear mixed binary logistic regression model controlling for state was performed to determine if the covariates of ownership, number of beds, and geographic locale were associated with a higher overall quality rating. Results: Of the 15,177 nursing homes included in the study sample, 69.2% were located in nonrural areas and 30.8% in rural areas. The t test analysis comparing the overall, health inspection, staffing, and quality measure ratings of rural and nonrural nursing homes yielded statistically significant results for 3measures, 2 of which (overall ratings and health inspections) favored rural nursing homes. Although a higher percentage of nursing homes (44.8%-42.2%) received a 4-star or higher rating, regression analysis using an overall rating of 4 stars or higher as the dependent variable revealed that when controlling for state and adjusting for size and ownership, rural nursing homes were less likely to have a 4-star or higher rating when compared with nonrural nursing homes (OR= .901, 95% CI 0.824-0.986). Conclusions: Mixed model logistic regression analysis suggested that rural nursing home quality was not comparable to that of nonrural nursing homes. When controlling for state and adjusting for nursing home size and ownership, rural nursing homes were not as likely to earn a 4-or higher star quality rating as nonrural nursing homes.
机译:背景:医学的进步和美国人口老龄化表明,对疗养院服务的需求将不断增加。尽管养老院受到高度监管和审查,但它们的质量仍然是一个问题,对生活在农村社区的人来说可能是一个更大的问题。尽管如此,很少有研究调查整个城乡连续体中养老院护理质量的差异。本研究的目的是通过使用医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心计算的多种质量指标的汇总排名来比较农村和非农村养老院的质量,并在其疗养院比较网站上报告。方法:采用独立抽样t检验,比较农村养老院和非农村养老院报告的质量指标的平均评分。执行控制状态的线性混合二元 Logistic 回归模型,以确定所有权、床位数量和地理位置的协变量是否与较高的整体质量评级相关。结果:在研究样本纳入的15,177家养老院中,69.2%位于非农村地区,30.8%位于农村地区。比较农村和非农村养老院的总体、健康检查、人员配备和质量措施评级的 t 检验分析得出了 3 项措施的统计学显着结果,其中 2 项(总体评级和健康检查)有利于农村养老院。尽管较高比例的养老院(44.8%-42.2%)获得4星或更高的评级,但使用4星或更高评级作为因变量的回归分析显示,在控制州并调整规模和所有权时,与非农村养老院相比,农村养老院获得4星或更高评级的可能性较小(OR= .901, 95% CI 0.824-0.986)。结论:混合模型logistic回归分析表明,农村养老院质量与非农村养老院不具有可比性。在控制州并调整养老院规模和所有权时,农村养老院不太可能像非农村养老院那样获得 4 星或更高的质量评级。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号