首页> 外文期刊>Brain topography >Detection of EEG Spatial-Spectral-Temporal Signatures of Errors: A Comparative Study of ICA-Based and Channel-Based Methods
【24h】

Detection of EEG Spatial-Spectral-Temporal Signatures of Errors: A Comparative Study of ICA-Based and Channel-Based Methods

机译:错误的脑电图时空时域特征的检测:基于ICA和基于通道的方法的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The present study aimed to investigate the sensitivity of independent component analysis (ICA)- and channel-based methods in detecting electroencephalography (EEG) spatial-spectral-temporal signatures of performance errors. 128-channel EEG signals recorded from 18 subjects, who performed a color-word matching Stroop task, were analyzed. The spatial-spectral-temporal patterns in event-related potentials (ERPs) and oscillatory activities (i.e., power and phase) were measured at four selected channels, i.e., FCz, Pz, O1 and O2, from original EEG data after preprocessing, EEG data after additional current source density (CSD) transform, and back-projected EEG data from individual ICs after additional ICA analysis. Pair-wise correlation coefficient (CC) and mutual information (MI), calculated from three EEG data at four selected channels, were compared to examine mutual correlations in EEG signals obtained through three different means. Thereafter, EEG signatures of errors from these three means were statistically compared at multiple time windows in the contrast of error and correct responses. Significantly decreased CC and MI values were observed in CSD- and ICA-processed EEGs as compared with original EEG, with the smallest CC and MI in ICA EEG. Similar error patterns in ERPs and peri-response oscillatory activities were detected in all three EEGs, whereas the pre-stimulus and post-stimulus error-related oscillatory patterns identified in ICA EEG were either not or only partially detected in both original EEG and CSD EEGs in general. Both CSD and ICA processes can largely reduce signal correlations due to the volume conduction effect in original EEG, and EEG signatures of errors are better detected by ICA-based method than channel-based method (i.e., original and CSD EEGs). ICA provides the best sensitivity to detect EEG signatures linked to specific neural processes via disentangling superimposed channel-level EEG signals into distinct neurocognitive process-related component signals.
机译:本研究旨在调查基于独立成分分析(ICA)和基于通道的方法在检测性能误差的脑电图(EEG)时空频谱特征中的敏感性。分析了18位受试者的128通道EEG信号,这些受试者执行了颜色词匹配的Stroop任务。在预处理后的原始EEG数据,EEG中,在四个选定的通道(即FCz,Pz,O1和O2)上测量了事件相关电位(ERP)和振荡活动(即功率和相位)的时空时空分布图额外的电流源密度(CSD)转换后的数据,以及额外的ICA分析后来自单个IC的反投影EEG数据。比较从四个选定通道的三个EEG数据计算出的成对相关系数(CC)和互信息(MI),以检查通过三种不同方式获得的EEG信号中的互相关。之后,在错误和正确响应的对比下,在多个时间窗口上对这三种方法的错误的EEG签名进行统计比较。与原始EEG相比,在CSD和ICA处理的EEG中观察到CC和MI值显着降低,在ICA EEG中CC和MI最小。在所有三个脑电图中都检测到了类似的ERPs错误模式和应答周围振荡活动,而​​在ICA EEG中识别出的刺激前和刺激后与错误相关的振荡模式在原始EEG和CSD EEG中均未或仅部分检测到一般来说。由于原始EEG中的体积传导效应,CSD和ICA过程都可以大大降低信号相关性,并且基于ICA的方法比基于通道的方法(即原始和CSD EEG)更好地检测到错误的EEG签名。 ICA通过将叠加的通道级EEG信号分解为与神经认知过程相关的独特成分信号,提供了最佳的灵敏度来检测与特定神经过程相关的EEG信号。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号