...
首页> 外文期刊>Crop, Forage & Turfgrass Management >Evaluation of soybean grain quality and yield across various row spacings, planting dates, and fungicide programs
【24h】

Evaluation of soybean grain quality and yield across various row spacings, planting dates, and fungicide programs

机译:评估不同行距、种植日期和杀菌剂方案的大豆籽粒质量和产量

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

One of the major constraints to profitable soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] production is yield losses caused by disease. The mid-southern region of the United States typically experiences environmental conditions that are conducive to disease development, particularly during later reproductive growth stages. It is common for producers in this region to apply fungicides at the beginning of pod development (R3 growth stage; development of pods 3/16 inches long). Producers often question if establishing crops in different row patterns would alter the yield response to prophylactic fungicide applications. Producers also seek answers regarding the yield and grain quality responses to fungicide applications across different row patterns. However, limiteddata exist to determine if fungicide applications influence the responses of soybean’s yield and grain quality between different row spacings. The objective of this research was to evaluate soybean’s growth, development, yield, and grain quality across various row spacings, planting dates, and prophylactic fungicide application programs in the absence of disease. These data support that early-planted soybean had greater yield than later-planted soybean. No interactions were observed among row spacing, planting date, and fungicide product with respect to yield. Independently, no yield differences were observed regardless of the row spacing or the fungicide product. Regarding quality, soybean planted later resulted in fewer total damaged soybean kernels. These data suggest that row spacing and planting date may not influence soybean’s yield response to prophylactic fungicide. Furthermore, these data also suggest that prophylactic fungicide during pod development may not influence the subsequent grain quality.
机译:的一个主要大豆约束来盈利[大豆(l)损失由疾病引起的。美国的一般经验有利于环境条件疾病的发展,特别是在以后生殖生长阶段。生产商在该地区应用杀菌剂pod发展(R3增长的开始阶段;如果建立作物生产者往往问题不同的行模式将改变收益率应对预防杀菌剂的应用程序。关于收益率也生产商寻求答案和粮食质量对杀菌剂的反应应用程序在不同的行模式。然而,limiteddata是否存在杀菌剂应用程序影响的反应大豆的产量和谷物品质之间不同的行间距。研究评估大豆的增长,开发、产量和谷物质量不同的行间距,种植日期、和预防杀菌剂应用程序没有疾病。early-planted大豆产量大于later-planted大豆。中观察到的行间距,种植日期和杀菌剂产品产量。独立,没有观察到产生差异无论行间距或杀菌剂产品。导致更少的总破坏大豆内核。这些数据表明,行间距和种植日期可能不影响大豆的产量反应预防性杀菌剂。数据还表明,预防杀菌剂在豆荚开发可能不影响随后的谷物质量。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Crop, Forage & Turfgrass Management》 |2023年第1期|Evaluation of soybean/1-Evaluation of soybean/7|共7页
  • 作者单位

    Dep. of Plant and Soil Sciences, Mississippi State Univ., Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA;

    Dep. of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology, Entomology, and Plant Pathology, Mississippi State Univ., Stoneville, MS 38776, USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 英语
  • 中图分类 农学(农艺学);
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号