...
首页> 外文期刊>Argus Global Markets >Banks find physical barriers
【24h】

Banks find physical barriers

机译:银行发现实体障碍

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

An Argus survey of 16 major investment banks shows that less than half are active participants in the physical oil market. Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs and Citi have directly or indirectly traded oil cargoes for at least a decade, but the four others that buy and sell physical oil only started in the past four years, as soaring prices raised the appeal of energy trading. Other large banks such as Bank of America say they have no plans to enter the business (see table).Physical oil trading is not cheap. Most banks now active in the cargo markets gained access to storage and transport infrastructure through costly acquisitions. And setting up teams to run operations and establish a client base is difficult. Some banks, including Morgan Stanley, took advantage of the collapse of US energy trading firms such as Enron in 2001 to hire physical oil traders. More recently, other banks have been willing to pay to acquire expertise.
机译:阿格斯(Argus)对16家主要投资银行的调查显示,在实体石油市场中,活跃的参与者不到一半。摩根士丹利(Morgan Stanley),高盛(Goldman Sachs)和花旗(Citi)至少有十年直接或间接地交易石油货物,但买卖实物石油的另外四个人仅在过去四年才开始,因为飞涨的价格提高了能源交易的吸引力。美国银行等其他大型银行表示,他们没有计划开展这项业务(见表)。实物石油交易并不便宜。现在活跃于货运市场的大多数银行都通过昂贵的收购获得了进入仓储和运输基础设施的渠道。建立团队来运营业务和建立客户基础非常困难。包括摩根士丹利(Morgan Stanley)在内的一些银行利用了美国能源贸易公司(如安然(Enron)在2001年倒闭)来雇用实物石油交易员。最近,其他银行也愿意为获得专业知识而付费。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号