...
首页> 外文期刊>Agro Economist >Cost and Return Analysis for Important Kharif Season Crops in Uttar Pradesh
【24h】

Cost and Return Analysis for Important Kharif Season Crops in Uttar Pradesh

机译:北方邦重要哈里夫季节作物的成本和回报分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The data on cost of cultivation and returns of major crops were collected from Directorate of Economics Statistics, Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welafare, Govt. of India for the year 2017-18. The share of labour power is higher in paddy, maize and groundnut while it is lesser in other pulse crops. In percentage term, the share of labour expenditure in total cost C_3 is highest that is 33.52 on an average in all important crops. In pulses, the share of irrigation expenditure is negligible in total cost, while, in maize and paddy, it is significant. The average expenditure on variable cost in selected seasonal kharif crops is 60.62 and on fixed cost is 30.29 of total cost C_3. The net return (on C_2 cost) is negative in most of the selected crops in kharif season and it is positive in Arhar and sesamum. The average net return in all the selected kharif season crops is negative. The Benefit cost ratio at C_2 is 0.84, 0.85, 0.89, 1.08, 0.89, 0.66,1.07, 0.76 and 0.88 for Maize, Bajra, Paddy, Arhar, Moong, Urad, Sesamum, groundnut and overall selected kharif season crops, respectively. The B:C ratio, in sugarcane cultivation is 1.6, which is quite higher in relation to selected crops of kharif in Uttar Pradesh in 2017-18. The variation in returns from different crops will lead to unequal distribution of resources among farmers. Thus, suitable purchase methods should be adopted for providing remunerative prices to the farmers.
机译:种植成本的数据,并返回主要农作物则来自于董事会经济学和统计学,农业部和农民Welafare,印度政府2017 - 18。水稻、玉米和花生虽然较小其他脉冲作物。劳动力支出C_3总成本最高平均33.52%重要的作物。灌溉费用可以忽略不计成本,同时,在玉米和水稻,它是有很重要的意义。成本选择季节性秋收作物作物是60.62%固定成本是总成本C_3的30.29%。净收益(c₂成本)是-在大多数秋收作物选择农作物的季节,它是积极在Arhar和胡麻属。返回所有选中的秋收作物季作物负的。0.85, 0.89, 1.08, 0.89, 0.66, 1.07, 0.76和0.88胡麻属、花生和整体选定的雨季季作物,分别。甘蔗种植是1.6,相当更高的选择与作物的雨季北方邦2017 - 18。从不同的作物会导致不平等的回报农民之间的资源分配。应采用合适的采购方法为农民提供的价格。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Agro Economist》 |2021年第2期|159-163|共5页
  • 作者单位

    ICAR- National Institute of Agricultural Economics and Policy Research, Pusa, New Delhi, India;

    Krishi Vigyan Kendra Hazaribagh, Jharkhand, India;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 英语
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号