...
首页> 外文期刊>Arthroscopy: the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association >Treating Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Medial Collateral Ligament Injuries Operatively in the Acute Setting Is Potentially Advantageous
【24h】

Treating Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Medial Collateral Ligament Injuries Operatively in the Acute Setting Is Potentially Advantageous

机译:在急性期手术治疗前交叉韧带和内侧副韧带联合损伤可能是有利的

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

? 2022Combined injury of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and medial collateral ligament (MCL) remains among the most common knee injury patterns in orthopaedics. Optimal treatment of grade III MCL injuries is still debated, especially when combined with ACL injury. Most patients with these severe injuries are treated conservatively for at least 6 weeks to allow for MCL healing, followed by delayed ACL reconstruction. Although acute treatment of the MCL was common in the 1970s, postoperative stiffness was frequently reported. Moreover, studies of such treatment failed to show clinical benefits of surgical over conservative treatment, and the MCL exhibited intrinsic healing capacity, leading to the consensus that all MCL injuries are treated conservatively. The current delayed treatment algorithm for ACL-MCL injuries has several disadvantages. First, MCL healing may be incomplete, resulting in residual valgus laxity that places the ACL graft at greater risk of failure. Second, delayed treatment lengthens the overall rehabilitation period, thereby prolonging the presence of atrophy and delaying return to preinjury activity levels. Third, the initial healing period leaves the knee unstable for longer and risks further intra-articular damage. Acute simultaneous surgical treatment of both ligaments has the potential to avoid these shortcomings. This article will review the evolution of treatment of ACL-MCL injuries and explain how it shifted toward the current treatment algorithm. We will (1) discuss why the consensus shifted, (2) discuss the shortcomings of the current treatment plan, (3) discuss the potential advantages of acute simultaneous treatment, and (4) present an overview of the available literature.
机译:? 韧带(ACL)和内侧副韧带(制程)是最常见的膝伤整形外科中的模式。三级制程损伤仍在讨论,特别是结合ACL损伤。这些严重损伤患者治疗允许保守至少6周恢复期治疗,其次是推迟ACL重建。在1970年代,制程是常见术后刚度经常被报道。这种治疗的研究未能显示临床在保守治疗手术的好处,和制程表现出内在的治愈能力,所有的制程损伤导致共识保守治疗。处理算法ACL-MCL受伤几个缺点。不完整,导致残余外翻松弛这地方ACL贪污的风险更大失败。整体康复期,从而延长萎缩和推迟返回的存在受伤前的活动水平。叶子的膝关节不稳定的治疗时期长和风险进一步关节内的损伤。急性同时手术治疗韧带有可能避免这些的缺点。进化ACL-MCL伤害和治疗解释它如何转向当前处理算法。共识转变,(2)讨论的缺点当前的治疗计划,(3)讨论急性同步的潜在优势治疗和(4)的概述可用的文学。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号