首页> 外文期刊>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery. >Early medial reconstruction combined with severely injured medial collateral ligaments can decrease residual medial laxity in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
【24h】

Early medial reconstruction combined with severely injured medial collateral ligaments can decrease residual medial laxity in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

机译:早期内侧重建联合严重损伤的内侧副韧带可以减少前交叉韧带重建中残留的内侧松弛

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Introduction This study aimed to describe an anatomic medial knee reconstruction technique for combined anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and grade III medial collateral ligament (MCL) injuries and to assess knee function and stability restoration in patients who underwent primary MCL reconstruction compared with primary repair. Methods A total of 105 patients who had undergone anatomic ACL reconstruction between 2008 and 2017 were enrolled in this retrospective study and divided into two groups according to concomitant MCL ruptures. Group A included patients with isolated ACL ruptures without MCL injuries. Group B included patients with both ACL and MCL injuries, and it was subdivided into three groups according to the severity of the MCL injury and treatment modality: B-1, grade I or II MCL injury treated conservatively; B-2: grade III MCL injury treated by primary MCL repair; and B-3: grade III MCL injury treated by primary reconstruction. Knee stability was measured via Telos valgus radiography at 6-month and 2-year postoperative. The Lysholm score, Tegner activity level, Likert scales (satisfaction), and return to previous sports were evaluated at 2-year postoperative. Results At 6-month postoperative, there was no significant difference in medial laxity between the B-2 and B-3 groups. However, at 2-year postoperative, medial laxity were significantly higher both at 30 degrees of flexion (5.2 degrees versus 2.2 degrees, p = 0.020) and at full extension (3.4 degrees versus 1.1 degrees, p < 0.001) in patients in B-2 group compared to those in B-3 group. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups with respect to Lysholm scores, Tegner activity levels, Likert scales (satisfaction), and returning to previous sports at the 2-year follow-up. Conclusion Primary medial reconstruction combined with severely injured MCL in ACL reconstruction may decrease residual medial laxity more than primary repair.
机译:引言 本研究旨在描述一种用于前交叉韧带 (ACL) 和 III 级内侧副韧带 (MCL) 联合损伤的解剖内侧膝关节重建技术,并评估接受初次内侧副韧带重建的患者与初次修复相比的膝关节功能和稳定性恢复。方法 回顾性研究选取2008—2017年间行解剖前交叉韧带重建术的105例患者,根据合并的内侧副韧带断裂情况分为两组。A组包括无内侧副韧带损伤的孤立性ACL断裂患者。B组包括前交叉韧带和内侧副韧带损伤患者,根据内侧副韧带损伤的严重程度和治疗方式分为三组:保守治疗的B-1、I级或II级内侧副韧带损伤;B-2:通过初级内侧副韧带修复治疗的III级内侧副韧带损伤;B-3:通过一期重建治疗的 III 级内侧副韧带损伤。术后 6 个月和 2 年通过 Telos 外翻 X 线摄影测量膝关节稳定性。术后 2 年评估 Lysholm 评分、Tegner 活动水平、李克特量表(满意度)和恢复既往运动。结果 术后6个月,B-2组与B-3组内侧松弛程度差异无统计学意义。然而,在术后 2 年,屈曲 30 度(5.2 度对 2.2 度,p = 0.020)和完全伸展时的内侧松弛度显着更高 (3.B-2组患者与B-3组相比,4度对1.1度,p<0.001)。在2年的随访中,两组在Lysholm评分、Tegner活动水平、李克特量表(满意度)和恢复既往运动方面无统计学差异。结论 前交叉韧带重建中一期内侧重建联合重度损伤内侧副韧带比一期修复更能减少残余内侧松弛。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号