首页> 外文期刊>Biology of blood and marrow transplantation: journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation >Immune reconstitution after double umbilical cord blood stem cell transplantation: Comparison with unrelated peripheral blood stem cell transplantation
【24h】

Immune reconstitution after double umbilical cord blood stem cell transplantation: Comparison with unrelated peripheral blood stem cell transplantation

机译:双脐血干细胞移植后的免疫重建:与无关的外周血干细胞移植的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Double umbilical cord blood (DUCB) transplantation is an accepted transplantation strategy for patients without suitable human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matched donors. However, DUCB transplantation is associated with increased morbidity and mortality because of slow recovery of immunity and a high risk of infection. To define the differences in immune reconstitution between DUCB transplantation and HLA matched unrelated donor (MUD) transplantation, we performed a detailed, prospective analysis of immune reconstitution in 42 DUCB recipients and 102 filgrastim-mobilized unrelated peripheral blood stem cell recipients. Reconstitution of CD3 T cells was significantly delayed in the DUCB cohort compared with the MUD cohort for 1 to 6 months posttransplantation (P < 001), including naive (CD45RO-) and memory (CD45RO+) CD4 T cells, regulatory (CD4CD25) T cells, and CD8 T cells. In contrast, CD19 B cells recovered more rapidly in the DUCB cohort and numbers remained significantly greater from 3 to 24 months after transplantation (P = 001). CD56CD16 natural killer (NK) cells also recovered more rapidly in DUCB recipients and remained significantly greater from 1 to 24 months after transplantation. B cell activating factor (BAFF) levels were higher in the DUCB cohort at 1 month (P < 001), were similar in both cohorts at 3 and 6 months, and were lower in the DUCB cohort at 12 months (P = 002). BAFF/CD19 B cell ratios were lower in the DUCB cohort at 3 (P = 045), 6 (P = 02), and 12 months (P = 002) after transplantation. DUCB recipients had more infections within the first 100 days after transplantation (P < 001), and there was less chronic graft-versus-host disease (P < 001), but there were no differences in cumulative incidence of relapse, nonrelapse death, progression-free survival, or overall survival between the 2 groups. These results suggest that increased risk of infections is specifically associated with delayed reconstitution of all major T cell subsets, but the increased risk is limited to the first 3 months after DUCB transplantation. There is no increased risk of relapse, suggesting that graft-versus-leukemia activity is maintained. Early reconstitution of B cells and NK cells may, in part, account for these findings.
机译:对于没有合适的人白细胞抗原(HLA)匹配供体的患者,双脐带血(DUCB)移植是公认的移植策略。但是,由于免疫功能恢复缓慢和感染风险高,DUCB移植会增加发病率和死亡率。为了定义DUCB移植和HLA匹配无关供体(MUD)移植之间免疫重建的差异,我们对42个DUCB受体和102例非格司亭动员的无关外周血干细胞接受者的免疫重建进行了详细的前瞻性分析。与MUD队列相比,DUCB队列中CD3 T细胞的重建在移植后1至6个月明显延迟(P <001),包括幼稚(CD45RO-)和记忆(CD45RO +)CD4 T细胞,调节性(CD4CD25)T细胞和CD8 T细胞。相反,在DUCB队列中,CD19 B细胞恢复得更快,并且移植后3至24个月的数量仍显着更高(P = 001)。 CD56CD16自然杀伤(NK)细胞在DUCB受体中也恢复得更快,并且在移植后1到24个月仍显着更大。 B细胞激活因子(BAFF)水平在DUCB队列中在1个月时较高(P <001),在3个月和6个月时在两个队列中相似,而在12个月时在DUCB队列中较低(P = 002)。 DUCB队列中的BAFF / CD19 B细胞比率在移植后3(P = 045)​​,6(P = 02)和12个月(P = 002)较低。 DUCB接受者在移植后的前100天内感染较多(P <001),并且慢性移植物抗宿主病的发生率较低(P <001),但是复发的累积发生率,非复发的死亡,病程进展没有差异。无生存期,或两组之间的总体生存期。这些结果表明,感染的风险增加与所有主要T细胞亚群的重建延迟特别相关,但是增加的风险仅限于DUCB移植后的前3个月。没有增加复发的风险,表明移植物抗白血病活性得以维持。 B细胞和NK细胞的早期重建可能部分解释了这些发现。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号