首页> 外文期刊>Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology. >Atrial Arrhythmia Ablation in Patients With D-Transposition of the Great Arteries and Atrial Switch
【24h】

Atrial Arrhythmia Ablation in Patients With D-Transposition of the Great Arteries and Atrial Switch

机译:大动脉和心房开关 D 转位患者的房性心律失常消融术

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background: Patients with D-transposition of the great arteries and atrial switch have a high incidence of atrial arrhythmias. We sought to analyze the arrhythmia substrate, ablation strategies, and outcomes for catheter ablation in this population. Methods: An in-depth analysis of all clinical and procedural data in patients with D-transposition of the great arteries, atrial baffles, and atrial arrhythmia ablation was performed. Results: A cohort of 32 patients (72% male, mean age 38 +/- 7 years) underwent ablation for non-AV nodal reentrant tachycardia atrial arrhythmias, and 4 patients underwent AV nodal reentrant tachycardia ablation. Cavotricuspid isthmus flutter (CTI-flutter) was the most common arrhythmia, encountered in 75% of patients, followed by scar-related intraatrial reentrant tachycardia (non-CTI intraatrial reentrant tachycardia, 53%) and focal atrial tachycardia (focal atrial tachycardia, 6%). Among the 32 patients, 26 underwent 31 procedures at our institution. For patients with prior outside intervention, the index ablation at our institution revealed CTI-dependent flutter in 3/5 cases. However, redo ablation after an index ablation with demonstrated bidirectional CTI block revealed different/new arrhythmia substrates (80% non-CTI intraatrial reentrant tachycardia, 40% focal atrial tachycardia). Achieving bidirectional block across the CTI often required ablating on both sides of the baffle (retroaortic access, 81%; using a baffle leak, 11.5%; or transbaffle puncture, 7.7%). Combined approaches were necessary in 19% to reach the critical tissue. Acute procedural success was 81%, and recurrence was documented in 58% of patients. Despite recurrence, clinical arrhythmia burden was significantly reduced post-ablation (P<0.001), with rare episodes, amenable to antiarrhythmic therapy. Redo ablation was required in 5 (19%) patients and uncovered new arrhythmia substrates. AV nodal reentrant tachycardia ablation also required transbaffle approaches in 3/4 patients. Conclusions: CTI-dependent flutter was the most common arrhythmia in patients with Dextro-Transposition of the Great Arteries and atrial switch. Transbaffle approaches were often necessary, and, provided that bidirectional CTI block was achieved at the index ablation, late recurrence was due to different arrhythmia mechanisms. Despite recurrence, ablation was associated with significant clinical improvement.
机译:背景:D-transposition的患者伟大的动脉,心房有很高的转换心房心律失常的发生率。分析心律失常基质,消融导管消融的策略和结果这个人口。所有患者的临床和程序数据D-transposition伟大的动脉,心房挡板,心房心律失常消融执行。男性,平均年龄38 + / - 7年)接受消融对于非av节点可重入心动过速心房心律失常和4例病人接受了AV节点可重入心动过速消融。地峡颤振(CTI-flutter)是最常见的心律失常,出现在75%的患者中,其次是scar-related intraatrial凹心动过速(non-CTI intraatrial凹心动过速,53%)和焦心房心动过速(焦心房心动过速,6%)。患者,26日在我们经历了31个程序机构。干预,索引消融在我们在3/5机构透露CTI-dependent颤振用例。消融了双向CTI块显示不同的/新的心律失常基板(80% non-CTI intraatrial凹心动过速,40%焦心房心动过速)。实现双向CTI块经常需要去除两边的挡板(retroaortic访问,81%;泄漏,11.5%;组合方法是必要的在19%达到关键的组织。成功是81%,复发是记录58%的患者。心律失常负担显著降低消融后(P < 0.001),与罕见的事件,适合抗心律失常的治疗。需要在5例(19%)患者和发现新的心律失常基质。心动过速消融还要求transbaffle方法在3/4的病人。CTI-dependent颤振是最常见的心律失常患者Dextro-Transposition伟大的动脉和心房开关。Transbaffle方法通常是必要的,提供双向CTI块实现指数消融,晚期复发是由于不同的心律失常机制。尽管复发,消融是相关联的重要的临床改善。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号