首页> 外文期刊>Psychological Methods >Parsimony in Model Selection: Tools for Assessing Fit Propensity
【24h】

Parsimony in Model Selection: Tools for Assessing Fit Propensity

机译:模型选择中的简约:评估拟合倾向的工具

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Theories can be represented as statistical models for empirical testing. There is a vast literature on model selection and multimodel inference that focuses on how to assess which statistical model, and therefore which theory, best fits the available data. For example, given some data, one can compare models on various information criterion or other fit statistics. However, what these indices fail to capture is the full range of counterfactuals. That is, some models may fit the given data better not because they represent a more correct theory, but simply because these models have more fit propensity-a tendency to fit a wider range of data, even nonsensical data, better. Current approaches fall short in considering the principle of parsimony (Occam's Razor), often equating it with the number of model parameters. Here we offer a toolkit for researchers to better study and understand parsimony through the fit propensity of structural equation models. We provide an R package (ockhamSEM) built on the popular lavaan package. To illustrate the importance of evaluating fit propensity, we use ockhamSEM to investigate the factor structure of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Translational Abstract How should we assess which theory or model is correct in light of available data? One approach is to use information criteria or other fit statistics to compare which model best fits the available data. But this approach ignores parsimony. Some models may fit the given data better not because they represent a more correct theory, but simply because these models have more fit propensity-a tendency to better fit a wider range of data, even nonsensical data. Here we offer a toolkit for researchers to assess parsimony through the fit propensity of structural equation models. We provide an R package (ockhamSEM) built on the popular lavaan package. We illustrate the importance of evaluating fit propensity by using ockhamSEM to investigate the factor structure of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale.
机译:可以表示为统计模型理论实证测试。在模型选择和multimodel推理重点是如何评估统计模型,因此,理论,最适合可用的数据。可以比较各种信息模型标准或其他合适的统计数据。这些指标不能捕获是全方位的反设事实。给定的数据最好不要因为他们代表更正确的理论,只是因为这些模型更适合propensity-a倾向于健康更大范围的数据,甚至荒谬的数据,更好。考虑精简原则(奥卡姆的剃须刀),经常将它等同于的数量模型参数。研究人员来更好地学习和理解吝啬的健康倾向结构方程模型。lavaan包(ockhamSEM)建立在流行包中。评估健康倾向,我们使用ockhamSEM罗森博格的因子结构进行调查自尊量表。我们应该评估理论或模型是正确的吗根据可用的数据?使用标准或其他适合的信息统计比较哪种模式最适合可用的数据。模型可能适合给定的数据最好不要,因为他们代表一个更正确的理论,只是因为这些模型更适合propensity-a倾向于更好地适应更广泛的数据,甚至荒谬的数据。研究人员评估通过的吝啬结构方程模型的合适的倾向。提供一个R包(ockhamSEM)建造的受欢迎的lavaan包。评估适合倾向使用的重要性ockhamSEM调查的因素结构罗森伯格自尊量表。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号