首页> 外文期刊>Canadian Medical Association Journal: Journal de l'Association Medicale Canadienne >Effectiveness of intrapartum fetal surveillance to improve maternal and neonatal outcomes: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
【24h】

Effectiveness of intrapartum fetal surveillance to improve maternal and neonatal outcomes: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

机译:产时胎儿监测的有效性改善孕产妇和新生儿的结果:一个系统回顾和网络荟萃分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Cesarean delivery is the most common surgical procedure worldwide. Intrapartum fetal surveillance is routinely offered to improve neonatal outcomes, but the effects of different methods on the risk of emergency cesarean deliveries remains uncertain. We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of different types of fetal surveillance. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL until June 1, 2020, for randomized trials evaluating any intrapartum fetal surveillance method. We performed a network meta-analysis within a frequentist framework. We assessed the quality and network inconsistency of trials. We reported primarily on intrapartum emergency cesarean deliveries and other secondary maternal and neonatal outcomes using risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: We included 33 trials (118863 patients) evaluating intermittent auscultation with Pinard stethoscope/ handheld Doppler (IA), cardiotocography (CTG), computerized cardiotocography (cCTG), CTG with fetal scalp lactate (CTG-lactate), CTG with fetal scalp pH analysis (CTG-FBS), CTG with fetal pulse oximetry (FPO-CTG), CTG with fetal heart electrocardiogram (CTG-STAN) and their combinations. Intermittent auscultation reduced the risk of emergency cesarean deliveries compared with other types of surveillance (IA v. CTG: RR 0.83,95% Cl 0.72-0.97; IA v. CTG-FBS: RR 0.71, 95% Cl 0.63-0.80; IA v. CTG-lactate: RR 0.77, 95% Cl 0.64-0.92; IA v. FPO-CTG: RR 0.75,95% Cl 0.65-0.87; IA v. FPO-CTG-FBS: RR 0.81,95% Cl 0.67-0.99; cCTG-FBS v. IA: RR 1.21, 95% Cl 1.04-1.42), except STAN-CTG-FBS (RR 1.17, 95% Cl 0.98-1.40) (see figure). A similar reduction was observed for emergency cesarean deliveries for fetal distress. None of the evaluated methods was associated with a reduced risk of neonatal acidemia, neonatal unit admissions, Apgar scores or perinatal death. Interpretation: Compared with other types of fetal surveillance, intermittent auscultation seems to reduce emergency cesarean deliveries in labour without increasing adverse neonatal and maternal outcomes.
机译:背景:剖腹产是最常见的外科手术。监测是经常提出改善新生儿的结果,但不同的影响紧急剖腹产的风险的方法交付仍不确定。系统回顾和网络荟萃分析评估不同类型的的有效性胎儿监测。Embase和中央,直到2020年6月1日随机试验评估任何产时胎儿监测方法。荟萃分析在一个频率论的框架。评估质量和网络的不一致试用紧急剖腹产手术或其他次要的孕产妇和新生儿的结果使用风险比率(RRs)和95%置信区间(CIs)。结果:我们包括33个试验(118863名患者)评估与Pinard间歇听诊听诊器/手持多普勒(IA),cardiotocography(玻纤),由电脑控制的cardiotocography (cCTG), CTG和胎儿头皮乳酸(CTG-lactate), CTG和胎儿头皮pH值分析(CTG-FBS),公司与胎儿脉搏血氧仪(FPO-CTG), CTG和胎儿心脏的心电图(CTG-STAN)及其组合。听诊减少紧急的风险剖腹产手术相比其他类型的监视(Cl IA诉CTG: RR 0.83, 95%0.72 - -0.97;0.63 - -0.80;0.64 - -0.92;0.65 - -0.87;0.67 - -0.99;1.04 - -1.42),除了STAN-CTG-FBS (RR 1.17, 95% Cl0.98 - -1.40)(见图)。观察到紧急剖腹产手术胎儿窘迫。降低新生儿的风险酸血症、新生儿单位招生,阿普加分数或围产期死亡。其他类型的胎儿监视,断断续续的听诊似乎减少紧急剖腹产交付在劳动力不增加不良新生儿和产妇的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号