首页> 外文期刊>Annals of surgical oncology >Validation of the mskcc and heng risk criteria models for predicting survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with sunitinib
【24h】

Validation of the mskcc and heng risk criteria models for predicting survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with sunitinib

机译:用mskcc和heng风险标准模型预测舒尼替尼治疗转移性肾细胞癌患者的生存

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Purpose. To validate the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) and Heng models with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with sunitinib, and to investigate prognostic factors in these patients. Methods. This study included 106 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who were treated with sunitinib from April 2007 to July 2012 including 35 patients who received systemic treatment before sunitinib and 71 that were naive to systemic treatment. Patients were evaluated using the MSKCC and Heng models, and the significance of several prognostic factors were evaluated. Results. The application of the MSKCC and Heng risk criteria resulted in stratification into 3 groups (favorable, intermediate, and poor risk) with distinctly different overall survival (OS) curves (P0.001 and P0.001, respectively), for the pretreated patients (P0.001 and P 0.001, respectively). The Heng model had slightly better discriminatory ability (v2 = 30.82, Harrell's C = 0.6895) than theMSKCC model (v2 = 25.13, Harrell's C = 0.6532). Multivariate analysis revealed that the absence of nephrectomy and no hypertension at baseline, along with elevated C-reactive protein levels, were independent risk factors for poorer OS. Conclusions. The MSKCC and Heng model were both valid models for predicting OS. The no nephrectomy, no hypertension at baseline, and high C-reactive protein levels were independently associated with poorer OS.
机译:目的。验证纪念斯隆-凯特琳癌症中心(MSKCC)和亨格模型与舒尼替尼治疗的转移性肾细胞癌,并调查这些患者的预后因素。方法。该研究包括2007年4月至2012年7月接受舒尼替尼治疗的106例转移性肾细胞癌患者,其中35例在舒尼替尼治疗之前接受了全身治疗,而71​​例尚未接受全身治疗。使用MSKCC和Heng模型对患者进行了评估,并对几种预后因素的意义进行了评估。结果。 MSKCC和Heng风险标准的应用将分层分为3​​组(有利,中度和差度风险),对于预治疗的患者,其总生存(OS)曲线明显不同(分别为P 0.001和P 0.001)( P 0.001和P 0.001)。与MSKCC模型(v2 = 25.13,Harrell C = 0.6532)相比,Heng模型具有更好的判别能力(v2 = 30.82,Harrell C = 0.6895)。多变量分析显示,基线时不进行肾切除术且无高血压,以及C反应蛋白水平升高是OS较差的独立危险因素。结论MSKCC和Heng模型都是预测OS的有效模型。无肾切除术,基线无高血压以及高C反应蛋白水平与较差的OS独立相关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号