...
首页> 外文期刊>Annals of Surgery >Evaluation of Long-term Survival After Hepatic Resection for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Multifactorial Model of 929 Patients.
【24h】

Evaluation of Long-term Survival After Hepatic Resection for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Multifactorial Model of 929 Patients.

机译:转移性结直肠癌肝切除术后长期生存的评估:929例患者的多因素模型。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE:: To identify risk factors associated with cancer-specific survival and develop a predictive model for patients undergoing primary hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer. BACKGROUND:: No published studies investigated collectively the inter-relation of factors related to patient cancer-specific survival after hepatectomy for metastatic colorectal cancer. METHODS:: Clinical, pathologic, and complete follow-up data were prospectively collected from 929 consecutive patients undergoing primary (n = 925) or repeat hepatic resection (n 80) for colorectal liver metastases at a tertiary referral center from 1987 to 2005. Parametric survival analysis was used to identify predictors of cancer-specific survival and develop a predictive model. The model was validated using measures of discrimination and calibration. RESULTS:: Postoperative mortality and morbidity were 1.5% and 25.9%, respectively. 5-year and 10-year cancer-specific survival were 36% and 23%. On multivariate analysis, 7 risk factors were found to be independent predictors of poor survival: number of hepatic metastases >3, node positive primary, poorly differentiated primary, extrahepatic disease, tumor diameter >/=5 cm, carcinoembyonic antigen level >60 ng/mL, and positive resection margin. The first 6 of these criteria were used in a preoperative scoring system and the last 6 in the postoperative setting. Patients with the worst postoperative prognostic criteria had an expected median cancer-specific survival of 0.7 years and a 5-year cancer-specific survival of 2%. Conversely, patients with the best prognostic postoperative criteria had an expected median cancer-specific survival of 7.4 years and a 5-year cancer-specific survival of 64%. When tested both predictive models fitted the data well with no significant differences between observed and predicted outcomes (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION:: Resection of liver metastases provides good long-term cancer-specific survival benefit, which can be quantified pre- or postoperatively using the criteria described. The "Basingstoke Predictive Index" may be used for risk-stratifying patients who may benefit from intensive surveillance and selection for adjuvant therapy and trials.
机译:目的:确定与癌症特异性生存相关的危险因素,并为转移性结直肠癌行原发性肝切除术的患者建立预测模型。背景:目前尚无公开研究集体调查与转移性结直肠癌肝切除术后患者癌症特异性生存相关因素的相互关系。方法:从前瞻性收集自1987年至2005年在三级转诊中心接受大肠肝转移的929例行原发性(n = 925)或重复肝切除术(n 80)的连续患者的临床,病理和完整的随访数据。生存分析用于确定癌症特异性生存的预测因素,并建立预测模型。使用判别和校准措施验证了该模型。结果:术后死亡率和发病率分别为1.5%和25.9%。 5年和10年癌症特异性生存率分别为36%和23%。在多变量分析中,发现7个危险因素是生存不良的独立预测因子:肝转移的数量> 3,淋巴结阳性,原发性低分化,肝外疾病,肿瘤直径> / = 5 cm,癌胚抗原水平> 60 ng / mL,切除切缘阳性。这些标准中的前6个用于术前评分系统,后6个用于术后环境。术后预后最差的患者预期的癌症特异性中位生存期为0.7年,癌症特异性5年生存期为2%。相反,具有最佳预后标准的患者预期的癌症特异性中位生存期为7.4年,而癌症特异性5年生存期为64%。在测试时,两个预测模型都很好地拟合了数据,观察到的结果与预测的结果之间没有显着差异(P> 0.05)。结论:肝转移切除术可提供良好的长期癌症特异性生存获益,可使用上述标准在术前或术后进行量化。 “ Basingstoke预测指标”可用于风险分层的患者,这些患者可能会受益于深入的监测和辅助治疗和试验的选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号