...
首页> 外文期刊>Bone marrow transplantation >Comparison of the classic Glucksberg criteria and the IBMTR Severity Index for grading acute graft-versus-host disease following HLA-identical sibling stem cell transplantation. International Bone Marrow Transplant Registry.
【24h】

Comparison of the classic Glucksberg criteria and the IBMTR Severity Index for grading acute graft-versus-host disease following HLA-identical sibling stem cell transplantation. International Bone Marrow Transplant Registry.

机译:比较经典Glucksberg标准和IBMTR严重性指数对HLA相同的同胞干细胞移植后的急性移植物抗宿主病分级。国际骨髓移植注册处。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Acute graft-versus-host disease (AGVHD) severity is usually graded (grades 0-IV) by the pattern of organ involvement using the classic Glucksberg-Seattle criteria (GSC). Recently, the International Bone Marrow Transplant Registry (IBMTR) developed a new Severity Index by regrouping the patterns of organ involvement into five Indexes (0-D) that appeared more predictive of transplant-related mortality (TRM) and transplant failure (TF, relapse or TRM). We studied the predictive value of both grading systems of TRM, TF and GVHD-related mortality (GTRM) in a series of 114 consecutive patients > or = 12 years old allografted from a histocompatible sibling at our institution, 100 of whom were evaluable for AGVHD. The IBMTR Severity Index showed better incremental prediction of TRM (relative risks (RR) of 1, 1.5, 1.4, 2 and 2.5 for Indexes 0, A, B, C and D), TF (RRs of 1, 1.6, 1.6, 2 and 2.3, respectively) and GTRM (RRs of 1, 2.2 and 4.8 for Indexes B, C and D) than the GSC. With the GSC different outcomes for TRM and TF were found only from grade 0 to I-II and 0 to IV or I-III to IV, but not from I-II to III. The GSC also appeared less predictive of GTRM (RRs of 1, 0.4 and 2.9 for grades II, III and IV). In our relatively small patient sample, the new IBMTR Severity Index appeared more predictive of transplant outcome than the GSC, especially between no AGVHD, early Indexes (A-B) and advanced Indexes (C-D).
机译:急性移植物抗宿主病(AGVHD)的严重程度通常使用经典的格吕克斯伯格-西雅图标准(GSC)通过器官受累的方式进行分级(0-IV级)。最近,国际骨髓移植注册机构(IBMTR)通过将器官受累模式重组为五个指数(0-D)来开发了一个新的严重性指数,这些指数似乎更能预测与移植相关的死亡率(TRM)和移植失败(TF,复发)或TRM)。我们研究了我们机构中来自组织相容性同胞的114名连续≥12岁的连续患者中TRM,TF和GVHD相关死亡率(GTRM)两种分级系统的预测价值,其中100名可评估AGVHD 。 IBMTR严重性指数显示出更好的TRM增量预测(指数0,A,B,C和D的相对风险(RR)为1、1.5、1.4、2和2.5),TF(RR为1、1.6、1.6、2和分别为2.3和GTRM(索引B,C和D的RR为1、2.2和4.8)。对于GSC,仅从0级到I-II级和0级到IV级或I-III级到IV级,而从I级-II级到III级才发现TRM和TF的不同结局。 GSC对GTRM的预测也较差(II,III和IV级的RR为1、0.4和2.9)。在我们相对较小的患者样本中,新的IBMTR严重程度指数似乎比GSC更能预测移植结果,尤其是在无AGVHD,早期指数(A-B)和高级指数(C-D)之间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号