...
首页> 外文期刊>Annals of Surgery >Biliary complications after liver transplantation from donation after cardiac death donors: an analysis of risk factors and long-term outcomes from a single center.
【24h】

Biliary complications after liver transplantation from donation after cardiac death donors: an analysis of risk factors and long-term outcomes from a single center.

机译:肝移植后胆源性并发症来自心源性死亡捐献者的捐赠:单个中心对危险因素和长期结局的分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the long-term outcomes, biliary complication rates, and risk factors for biliary complications after liver transplantation from "donation after cardiac death" (DCD) donors. BACKGROUND: Recent enthusiasm toward increased use of DCD donors' livers is mitigated by high biliary complication rates. Predictive risk factors for the development of biliary complications after DCD liver transplantation remain incompletely defined. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 1157 "donation after brain death" (DBD) and 87 DCD liver transplants performed between January 1, 1993, and December 31, 2008. Patient and graft survivals and complication rates within the first year of transplantation were compared between DBD and DCD groups. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the influence of potential risk factors. RESULTS: Patient survival was significantly lower in the DCD group compared with the DBD group at 1, 5, 10, and 15 years (DCD: 84%, 68%, 54%, and 54% vs DBD: 91%, 81%, 67%, and 58%; P < 0.01). Graft survival was also significantly lower in the DCD group compared with the DBD group at 1, 5, 10, and 15 years (DCD: 69%, 56%, 43%, 43% vs DBD: 86%, 76%, 60%, 51%; P < 0.001). Rates of overall biliary complications (OBC) (DCD: 47% vs DBD: 26%; P < 0.01) and ischemic cholangiopathy (IC) (DCD: 34% vs DBD: 1%; P < 0.01) were significantly higher in the DCD group. Donor age [hazard ratio (HR): 1.04; P < 0.01] and donor age greater than 40 years (HR: 3.13; P < 0.01) were significant risk factors for the development of OBC. Multivariate analysis revealed that cold ischemic time (CIT) greater than 8 hours (HR: 2.46; P = 0.05) and donor age greater than 40 years (HR: 2.90; P < 0.01) significantly increased the risk of IC. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term patient and graft survival after DCD liver transplantation remain significantly lower but acceptable when compared with DBD liver transplantations. Donor age and CIT greater than 8 hours are the strongest predictors for the development of IC. Careful selection of younger DCD donors and minimization of CIT may limit the incidence of severe biliary complications and improve the successful utilization of DCD donors' livers.
机译:目的:本研究评估了“心脏死亡后捐赠”(DCD)供体在肝移植后的长期结局,胆道并发症发生率以及胆道并发症的危险因素。背景:胆道并发症发生率高,减轻了人们对增加DCD供体肝脏使用的热情。 DCD肝移植后胆道并发症发生的预测危险因素仍未完全确定。方法:我们对1993年1月1日至2008年12月31日之间进行的1157例“脑死亡后捐赠”(DBD)和87例DCD肝移植进行了回顾性研究。患者和移植物的存活率以及移植第一年的并发症发生率均为在DBD和DCD组之间进行比较。使用Cox比例风险模型评估潜在风险因素的影响。结果:与DBD组相比,DCD组在1、5、10和15岁时的患者生存率显着降低(DCD:84%,68%,54%和54%,而DBD:91%,81%, 67%和58%; P <0.01)。与DBD组相比,DCD组在1,5、10和15岁时的移植物存活率也显着降低(DCD:69%,56%,43%,43%,而DBD:86%,76%,60% ,51%; P <0.001)。 DCD的总胆道并发症(OBC)(DCD:47%vs DBD:26%; P <0.01)和缺血性胆管病(IC)(DCD:34%vs DBD:1%; P <0.01)的发生率明显高于DCD组。供体年龄[危险比(HR):1.04; P <0.01]和供体年龄大于40岁(HR:3.13; P <0.01)是OBC发生的重要危险因素。多变量分析显示,寒冷缺血时间(CIT)大于8小时(HR:2.46; P = 0.05)和供体年龄大于40岁(HR:2.90; P <0.01)显着增加了发生IC的风险。结论:与DBD肝移植相比,DCD肝移植后患者和移植物的长期存活率仍显着降低,但可以接受。供体年龄和大于8小时的CIT是IC发展的最强预测因子。仔细选择较年轻的DCD供体和将CIT降至最低可能会限制严重的胆道并发症的发生,并改善DCD供体肝脏的成功利用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号