首页> 外文期刊>Applied occupational and environmental hygiene >The effects of temperature and pressure on airborne exposure concentrations when performing compliance evaluations using ACGIH TLVs and OSHA PELs.
【24h】

The effects of temperature and pressure on airborne exposure concentrations when performing compliance evaluations using ACGIH TLVs and OSHA PELs.

机译:使用ACGIH TLV和OSHA PEL进行符合性评估时,温度和压力对空气中暴露浓度的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Occupational hygienists perform air sampling to characterize airborne contaminant emissions, assess occupational exposures, and establish allowable workplace airborne exposure concentrations. To perform these air sampling applications, occupational hygienists often compare an airborne exposure concentration to a corresponding American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) threshold limit value (TLV) or an Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) permissible exposure limit (PEL). To perform such comparisons, one must understand the physiological assumptions used to establish these occupational exposure limits, the relationship between a workplace airborne exposure concentration and its associated TLV or PEL, and the effect of temperature and pressure on the performance of an accurate compliance evaluation. This article illustrates the correct procedure for performing compliance evaluations using airborne exposure concentrations expressed in both parts per million and milligrams per cubic meter. In so doing, a brief discussion is given on the physiological assumptions used to establish TLVs and PELs. It is further shown how an accurate compliance evaluation is fundamentally based on comparison of a measured work site exposure dose (derived from the sampling site exposure concentration estimate) to an estimated acceptable exposure dose (derived from the occupational exposure limit concentration). In addition, this article correctly illustrates the effect that atmospheric temperature and pressure have on airborne exposure concentrations and the eventual performance of a compliance evaluation. This article also reveals that under fairly moderate conditions of temperature and pressure, 30 degrees C and 670 torr, a misunderstanding of how varying atmospheric conditions affect concentration values can lead to a 15 percent error in assessing compliance.
机译:职业卫生人员进行空气采样以表征空气中污染物的排放,评估职业暴露并确定允许的工作场所空气中暴露浓度。为了执行这些空气采样应用,职业卫生学家经常将空气传播的浓度与相应的美国政府工业卫生学家会议(ACGIH)阈限值(TLV)或职业安全与健康管理局(OSHA)允许的暴露限值(PEL)进行比较。要进行这样的比较,必须了解用于建立这些职业接触限值的生理假设,工作场所空气传播浓度及其相关的TLV或PEL之间的关系,以及温度和压力对准确的依从性评估的影响。本文说明了使用空气中暴露浓度(以百万分之一和毫克每立方米表示)进行合规性评估的正确程序。这样做时,将简要讨论用于建立TLV和PEL的生理假设。进一步显示了准确的依从性评估是如何从测量的工作场所暴露剂量(从采样场所暴露浓度估计值中得出)到估计的可接受暴露剂量(从职业暴露极限浓度中得出)的比较基础上得出的。此外,本文正确地说明了大气温度和压力对空气中暴露浓度的影响以及最终的合格评定。本文还揭示了在温度和压力相当适度的条件下(30摄氏度和670托),对变化的大气条件如何影响浓度值的误解会导致评估顺应性时出现15%的误差。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号