首页> 外文期刊>Applied occupational and environmental hygiene >A laboratory evaluation of the accuracy and precision of the photovac snapshot portable gas chromatograph and the Drager Chip Measurement System monitor for benzene in air measurements.
【24h】

A laboratory evaluation of the accuracy and precision of the photovac snapshot portable gas chromatograph and the Drager Chip Measurement System monitor for benzene in air measurements.

机译:实验室对photovac快照便携式气相色谱仪和Drager Chip测量系统监测仪中空气中苯的准确性和精密度进行了实验室评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A laboratory evaluation of the accuracy and precision of two field instruments, the Photovac Snapshot Gas Chromatograph and the Drager Chip Measurement System (CMS) Monitor, both capable of specific determination of benzene, was carried out. The evaluation was based on the generation of a test atmosphere of known concentration of benzene in a stainless steel calibration chamber and simultaneous sampling of the test atmosphere by each instrument. At the same time, the chamber atmosphere was continuously monitored by one or two data logging photoionization detector (PID) hydrocarbon analysers. A series of six, 10-minute charcoal tube air samples of the test atmosphere was also collected over the 1-hour run and analyzed by gas chromatography. Nine different concentrations ranging from 0.25 ppm to 8 ppm were used. Accuracy was evaluated using National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) criteria. The Photovac GC consistently met the NIOSH recommended accuracy criteria of +/- 25 percent at or below 1 ppm of benzene, whereas the Drager CMS results generally fell slightly outside this criteria. Compared against less stringent accuracy criteria of +/- 35 percent, all Photovac GC results were acceptable but about 40 percent of Drager CMS results were not. The precision of Photovac GC (CV +/- 10%) is better than Drager CMS (CV = +/- 20% to 40%). Both instruments are, however, good field instruments provided their limitations are taken into account in their use.
机译:对两个现场仪器(Photovac快照气相色谱仪和Drager Chip测量系统(CMS)监控器)的准确性和精密度进行了实验室评估,这两种仪器均可特异性地测定苯。评估是基于在不锈钢校准室中生成已知浓度的苯的测试气氛并通过每种仪器同时采样测试气氛而进行的。同时,通过一两个数据记录光电离检测器(PID)碳氢化合物分析仪连续监测室内的气氛。在1小时的运行中,还收集了一系列六个,每分钟10分钟的木炭管空气样品,并通过气相色谱进行了分析。使用了0.25 ppm至8 ppm范围内的9种不同浓度。使用美国国家职业安全与健康研究所(NIOSH)标准评估准确性。 Photovac GC始终符合NIOSH推荐的准确度标准,即苯中1 ppm或以下时,准确度为+/- 25%,而Drager CMS结果通常略低于该标准。与不太严格的+/- 35%准确度标准相比,所有Photovac GC结果都是可以接受的,但约40%的Drager CMS结果是不可接受的。 Photovac GC(CV +/- 10%)的精度优于Drager CMS(CV = +/- 20%至40%)。但是,只要在使用时考虑到它们的局限性,这两种仪器都是很好的现场仪器。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号