首页> 外文期刊>Area >Does scientific conjecture accurately describe restoration practice? - Insight from an international river restoration survey
【24h】

Does scientific conjecture accurately describe restoration practice? - Insight from an international river restoration survey

机译:科学猜想是否准确地描述了恢复实践? -来自国际河流修复调查的见解

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Few sources exist to draw generalizations about the incredibly diverse international river restoration community. Generalizations in the restoration literature tend to be grounded on individual experiences or logical conjecture. To fill this perceived gap, an international web-based survey was launched. Over 500 respondents from 37 different countries participated. The results, posted on the web, act as a database of perceptions and individual experiences, from which the restoration community can make their own interpretations. With three examples, we contrast scientific conjecture with the perceptions of the restoration community who participated in this survey.
机译:很少有资料可以对国际河流恢复社区的多样性进行概括。恢复文献中的概括倾向于基于个人经验或逻辑推测。为了填补这一空白,发起了一项基于网络的国际调查。来自37个不同国家的500多名受访者参加了会议。结果发布在网络上,作为看法和个人经验的数据库,恢复社区可以据此做出自己的解释。通过三个示例,我们将科学猜想与参与该调查的修复社区的看法进行了对比。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号