...
首页> 外文期刊>Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition >Neonatal resuscitation: are your trainees performing as you think they are? A retrospective review of a structured resuscitation assessment for neonatal medical trainees over an 8-year period.
【24h】

Neonatal resuscitation: are your trainees performing as you think they are? A retrospective review of a structured resuscitation assessment for neonatal medical trainees over an 8-year period.

机译:新生儿复苏:您的学员表现是否如您所想?一项为期8年的针对新生儿医学受训者的结构性复苏评估的回顾性回顾。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

To ascertain whether Newborn Life Support Course (NLS) accredited trainees could demonstrate resuscitation skills appropriate to their level of training by providing standardised assessments of both junior and senior paediatric trainees during their induction period.Retrospective review of medical staff resuscitation assessments over an 8-year period from 2003 to 2010.A network-lead tertiary neonatal service with over 11 000 deliveries annually.Neonatal medical staff: junior (speciality trainee(ST) of years 1-3) and senior trainees (ST 4-8 with tier 2 on-call responsibilities).A standardised criterion-referenced assessment was performed by two NLS instructors. Junior trainee assessment focused on the basic airway skills learnt on an NLS course. Senior trainees demonstrated resuscitation of a baby with meconium-stained liquor, focusing on advanced life support, including intubation of the mannequin.Assessment outcomes were pass/fail; fails were categorised as algorithm failure, technical skills failure or both. For trainees who failed the first assessment, the outcome of the second assessment following appropriate feedback was recorded.Two hundred and sixty-two assessments were performed: 160 junior and 102 senior trainees; 98/160 (61%) of junior and 57/102 (56%) of senior trainees passed their first assessment; 69% of junior trainees who failed the first assessment had a second assessment recorded. There was a 79% pass rate at second assessment; 89% of senior trainees who failed a first assessment had a second assessment recorded. There was an 85% pass rate at second assessment. The majority of trainees who failed an assessment had problems with both the resuscitation algorithm and technical skills.Significant numbers of trainees who have been formally trained in neonatal resuscitation skills previously do not pass the standardised resuscitation assessment, thus require an additional input to maintain their competence in neonatal resuscitation.
机译:为了确定获得新生儿生命支持课程(NLS)培训的受训人员是否可以在入职期间对初级和高级儿科受训人员进行标准化评估,以证明适合其培训水平的复苏技能。对医务人员进行的复苏评估历时8年。从2003年到2010年。网络领导的三级新生儿服务,每年分娩超过11000次。新生儿医务人员:初级(1-3岁的专业培训生(ST))和高级培训生(4-8级的ST-4-8)呼叫责任)。由两名NLS指导员进行了标准化的标准参考评估。初级学员评估的重点是在NLS课程中学习的基本呼吸道技能。高级受训人员演示了用胎粪污染的液体对婴儿进行复苏,重点是高级生命支持,包括插管人体模型。评估结果为通过/失败;失败分为算法失败,技术技能失败或两者。对于未通过第一次评估的受训者,在适当反馈后记录第二次评估的结果。共进行了262次评估:初级培训生160名,高级培训生102名。 98/160(61%)的初中和57/102(56%)的高级受训者通过了首次评估;未通过第一次评估的初学者中有69%记录了第二次评估。第二次评估通过率为79%;第一次评估未通过的高级培训人员中有89%记录了第二次评估。第二次评估通过率为85%。评估失败的大多数学员在复苏算法和技术技能方面都存在问题。大量接受过新生儿复苏技能正规培训的学员以前未通过标准化复苏评估,因此需要额外的投入以保持其能力在新生儿复苏中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号