...
首页> 外文期刊>Neurology: Official Journal of the American Academy of Neurology >Stroke Impact Scale-16: A brief assessment of physical function.
【24h】

Stroke Impact Scale-16: A brief assessment of physical function.

机译:中风影响Scale-16:简要评估物理功能。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVES: To 1) develop a short instrument (Stroke Impact Scale-16 [SIS-16]) to assess physical function in patients with stroke at approximately 1 to 3 months poststroke using items from the composite physical domain of the Stroke Impact Scale (SIS) version 3.0, and 2) compare the SIS-16 and a commonly used disability measure, the Barthel Index (BI), in terms of their ability to discriminate disability. METHODS: A total of 621 subjects enrolled in the GAIN Americas randomized stroke trial were included in this study. Rasch analysis, which models the probability of a subject's response to an item using both subject ability and item difficulty, was used to construct the SIS-16, describe its properties, and compare its ordering and range of item difficulties to those of the BI. Box plots and analysis of variance were used to examine differences in BI and SIS-16 scores across modified Rankin categories. RESULTS: The study sample had an average age of 68 +/- 12.4 years and 56% were men. Stroke diagnoses were classified as minor in 91 patients (NIH Stroke Scale score [NIHSS] 0 to 5), moderate in 304 (NIHSS 6 to 13), and major in 226 (NIHSS >/= 14). Twelve of the original 28 items in the SIS version 3.0 composite physical domain were eliminated to produce the SIS-16, with a minimal loss of reliability. As compared to the BI, the SIS-16 contains more difficult items that can differentiate patients with less severe limitations, and therefore has less pronounced ceiling effects. SIS-16 scores were significantly different across Rankin levels 0 to 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, whereas BI was significantly different only across Rankin levels 0 to 2, 3, 4, and 5. CONCLUSION: Compared to the BI, the SIS-16 is an excellent collection of items suitable for assessing a wide range of physical function limitations of patients with stroke at 1 to 3 months poststroke. Because of a less pronounced ceiling effect, the SIS-16 can differentiate lower levels of disability as compared to the BI.
机译:目的:1)开发一个短的仪器(中风影响Scale-16 [SIS-16])来评估中风患者的身体功能大约1 - 3个月卒中后使用复合的物理领域商品的原因中风的影响规模(SIS)版本3.0,2)比较SIS-16和常用的残疾Barthel指数(BI)的他们歧视残疾人的能力。方法:共有621名受试者中美洲获得随机中风试验纳入本研究。主题的反应的概率模型一个项目使用这两种主体能力和项目困难,是用于构造SIS-16,描述其属性,并比较其排序和范围的项目的困难BI。检查BI和SIS-16分数的差异在改良Rankin类别。研究样本的平均年龄68 + / - 12.4年,56%都是男性。91年列为小中风患者(NIH量表评分(署)0 5),温和的304年(6 - 13)署,226年主要署> / = 14)。在SIS十二最初的28项版本3.0复合物理域消除生产SIS-16,最小损失的可靠性。SIS-16项目可以包含更多的困难区分不太严重的患者限制,因此更明显天花板效应。不同的跨兰金级别0到1,2,3,4,和5,而BI是明显不同的只有在兰金水平0到2、3、4和5。结论:BI, SIS-16相比是一个优秀的适合的项的集合评估范围广泛的生理功能中风患者在1 - 3的局限性个月卒中后。天花板效应,SIS-16可以区分低水平的残疾而BI。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号