...
首页> 外文期刊>Neurology: Official Journal of the American Academy of Neurology >Effect of clopidogrel with aspirin on functional outcome in TIA or minor stroke CHANCE substudy
【24h】

Effect of clopidogrel with aspirin on functional outcome in TIA or minor stroke CHANCE substudy

机译:氯吡格雷与阿司匹林对功能的影响结果TIA或substudy轻微中风的机会

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective:We compared the effect of clopidogrel plus aspirin vs aspirin alone on functional outcome and quality of life in the Clopidogrel in High-risk Patients with Acute Non-disabling Cerebrovascular Events (CHANCE) trial of aspirin-clopidogrel vs aspirin alone after acute minor stroke or TIA.Methods:Participants were assessed at 90 days for functional outcome using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and quality of life using the EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D). Poor functional outcome was defined as mRS score of 2-6 at 90 days and poor quality of life as EQ-5D index score of 0.5 or less.Results:Poor functional outcome occurred in 254 patients (9.9%) in the clopidogrel-aspirin group, as compared with 299 (11.6%) in the aspirin group (p = 0.046). Poor quality of life occurred in 142 (5.5%) in the clopidogrel-aspirin group and in 175 (6.8%) in the aspirin group (p = 0.06). Disabling stroke at 90 days occurred in 166 (6.5%) in the clopidogrel-aspirin group and in 219 (8.5%) in the aspirin group (p = 0.01). In stratified analysis by subsequent stroke, there was no difference in 90-day functional outcome and quality of life between the 2 groups.Conclusions:In patients with minor stroke or TIA, the combination of clopidogrel and aspirin appears to be superior to aspirin alone in improving the 90-day functional outcome, and this is consistent with a reduction in the rate of disabling stroke in the dual antiplatelet arm.Classification of evidence:This study provides Class II evidence that for patients with acute minor stroke or TIA, clopidogrel plus aspirin compared to aspirin alone improves 90-day functional outcome (absolute reduction of poor outcome 1.70%, 95% confidence interval 0.03%-3.42%).
机译:目的:我们比较氯吡格雷的效果+阿司匹林和阿司匹林独自功能结果在氯吡格雷和生活质量高危患者严重的致残性脑血管事件(机会)的审判急性后aspirin-clopidogrel vs阿司匹林单独小中风或TIA。评估功能结果使用的90天修改后的兰金(夫人)的质量和规模用EuroQol-5维度(EQ-5D)。功能结果被定义为分数的夫人2 - 6 90天EQ-5D和穷人的生活质量指数为0.5或更少。功能的结果发生在254年的病人clopidogrel-aspirin组(9.9%),与299年相比(11.6%),阿司匹林组(p= 0.046)。clopidogrel-aspirin组(5.5%)和阿司匹林组175例(6.8%)(p = 0.06)。禁用中风90天发生在166年clopidogrel-aspirin组(6.5%)和阿司匹林组219例(8.5%)(p = 0.01)。后续的分层分析中风在90天的功能结果没有区别吗和生活质量之间的2组。或TIA,氯吡格雷和阿司匹林似乎优于阿司匹林在改善90天的功能结果,这是与减少的速度一致禁用中风的双重抗血小板手臂。二类提供证据证明患者急性小中风或TIA,氯吡格雷+阿司匹林阿司匹林相比仅提高了90天功能结果(绝对减少贫穷结果1.70%、95%置信区间0.03%-3.42%).

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号