首页> 外文期刊>Canadian Medical Association Journal: Journal de l'Association Medicale Canadienne >Effectiveness of disseminating consensus management recommendations for ulcer bleeding: a cluster randomized trial
【24h】

Effectiveness of disseminating consensus management recommendations for ulcer bleeding: a cluster randomized trial

机译:传播效果一致管理建议溃疡出血:a集群随机试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background: International guidelines for the management of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding have not been widely adopted in clinical practice. We sought to determine whether a national, multifaceted intervention could improve adherence to guidelines, especially for patients at high risk of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.Methods: In this randomized trial, we stratified hospitals by region and size and allocated sites to either the control or experimental group. Health care workers in the experimental group were given published guidelines, generic algorithms, stratification scoring systems and written reminders and attended multidisciplinary guideline education groups and case-based workshops. These interventions were implemented over a 12-month period after randomization, with performance feedback and benchmarking. The primary outcome of adherence rates to key guidelines in endoscopic and pharmacologic management, determined by chart review, was adjusted according to site characteristics and possible within-site dependencies. We also report the rates of adherence to other recommendations.Results: Forty-three sites were randomized to the experimental (n = 21) or control (n = 22) groups. In our primary analysis, we compared patients before (experimental group: n = 402 patients; control group: n = 424 patients) and after (experimental group: n = 361 patients; control group: n = 389 patients) intervention. Patient-level analysis revealed no significant difference in adherence rates to the guidelines after the intervention (experimental group: 9.8%; control group: 4.8%; p = 0.99) after adjustment for the rate of adherence before the intervention (experimental group: 13.2%; control group: 7.1%). The adherence rates to other guidelines were similar and decreased over time, varying between 5% and 93%.Interpretation: This national knowledge translation-based trial suggests poor adherence to guidelines on nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Adherence was not improved by an educational intervention, which highlights both the complexity and poor predictability of attempting to alter the behaviour of health care providers (Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, no. MCT-88113).
机译:背景:国际指南nonvariceal上消化道的管理出血没有在临床被广泛采用练习。国家、多方面的干预可以改善坚持准则,尤其是对病人在高nonvariceal上的风险消化道出血。随机试验,我们分层医院地区和大小和分配网站的控制或实验组。实验组的工人发布指导方针,通用的算法,分层评分系统和写提醒和参加了多学科指导教育组织和案例研讨会。在12个月期间随机化后,绩效反馈和基准测试。主要结果依从率的关键指南在内窥镜和药物管理、由图审查根据网站特点和调整可能网站或依赖性。坚持其他的利率建议。随机试验(n = 21)或者控制(n = 22)组。我们之前相比病人(实验组:n = 402例;病人)和后(实验组:n = 361病人;干预。在依从率显著性差异的指导方针后干预实验组:9.8%;调整前的符合率干预(实验组:13.2%;组:7.1%)。指导方针相似和减少随着时间的推移,变化在5%和93%之间。国家知识翻译试验表明穷人坚持准则nonvariceal上消化道出血。坚持并不是通过一个教育改进干预,既突出了尝试的复杂性和不可预测性改变卫生保健提供者的行为(试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov,没有。MCT-88113)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号